From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: lists@lonnie.abelbeck.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ae6659a4 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibughas.pair.com (ibughas.pair.com [209.68.5.177]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e14ab70a for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibughas.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ibughas.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721B71E3037 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:11:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macpro.priv.abelbeck.com (wsip-70-184-211-148.om.om.cox.net [70.184.211.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ibughas.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 315551E302F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:11:14 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] WireGuard Snapshot `0.0.20180620` Available From: Lonnie Abelbeck In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:11:13 -0500 Message-Id: <8B706799-0A06-449B-960B-08C017C58412@lonnie.abelbeck.com> References: To: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On Jun 20, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld = wrote: >=20 > A new snapshot, `0.0.20180620`, has been tagged in the git repository. I find 0.0.20180620 much slower than previous version 0.0.20180531 All things being equal, only WireGuard version changes. Both boxes: # uname -a Linux pbx 3.16.54-astlinux #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jun 11 09:17:57 CDT 2018 = x86_64 GNU/Linux Test: 0.0.20180531 -- Qotom Q190G4N-S07 NIC x4 # iperf3 -s Jetway NF9HG-2930 NIC x4 # iperf3 -c 10.4.0.10 -t30 -P2 [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 2.65 GBytes 758 Mbits/sec 571 = sender [SUM] 0.00-30.02 sec 2.64 GBytes 756 Mbits/sec = receiver -- Test: 0.0.20180620 -- Qotom Q190G4N-S07 NIC x4 # iperf3 -s Jetway NF9HG-2930 NIC x4 # iperf3 -c 10.4.0.10 -t30 -P2 [SUM] 0.00-30.00 sec 1.50 GBytes 430 Mbits/sec 96 = sender [SUM] 0.00-30.02 sec 1.50 GBytes 428 Mbits/sec = receiver -- Interesting note, using -P1 the difference is not as pronounced, but = still slower. Any ideas ? Lonnie