From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88639C38A29 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE0521D93 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=msfjarvis.dev header.i=@msfjarvis.dev header.b="LaTJS/FM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFE0521D93 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=msfjarvis.dev Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 26901c3f; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com (sendmail.purelymail.com [34.202.193.197]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id c514e555 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:48:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=LaTJS/FMhAgFm2cEFEey31hMT7KBb4vzMAmFzFGy1RQC1Wn6AziLr4V8LYm9L9fE2Ayf+pF8RV3IHFcj34effj0Ohg/WP1T2ouOV+h5B7FFcRkfwn7BNZFQUb4N1ytNqgKcTdFGg8a1wmMLlcwM85bvQWGWIlQEaxHc7DuBek1JPTNitOzA2bbdbDOUbkomP+YvufnWlxnAdtP3k4ZlEW+bLBglVh0CA33NZhKBNH155+6fLZU+zmnc5j2kGgeI/iko/kawszqRYoVoxuHpjj4TSivkLrdY0JNwNFwW7O5zJjHXxOEfShxZptssYAhbIjfCMjrwhg/QMyNEDX1ioKg==; s=purelymail1; d=msfjarvis.dev; v=1; bh=F1cLlaPrsNYp4uVHsv/ih6PqqPxWrlrzxiY8eRbuEek=; h=from:to:received; Authentication-Results: purelymail.com; auth=pass X-UserIsAuth: true Received: from 147.75.32.83 (EHLO mail.msfjarvis.dev) ([147.75.32.83]) by ip-172-30-0-208.ec2.internal (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID 313392909; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:58:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0 From: "Harsh Shandilya" Message-ID: <8bca79f715ae5c649b5b717feef8e704@msfjarvis.dev> Subject: Re: Question about Crowdin operation To: "Eiji Tanioka" , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com In-Reply-To: References: X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: me@msfjarvis.dev Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" April 18, 2020 9:25 PM, "Eiji Tanioka" wrote:=0A= =0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> I'm translating WireGuard apps into Japanese.=0A> I hav= e a question about operation in Crowdin.=0A> =0A> When translate, we tran= slators need to clarify about original string's=0A> context or meaning. I= n that situation, which option is preferred?=0A> =0A> - send ML about que= stion.=0A> - in Crowdin, use comment.=0A> - in Crowdin, use comment and f= lag "Issue".=0A> - in Crowdin, use Discussion.=0A> =0A> # I had used seco= nd option, but never mention to anyone.=0A> # Should I had to mention to = ?=0A=0AThe second option is perfectly fine, though you'll have better luc= k if you=0Amention me or Jason since that will ensure Crowdin does not sw= allow up the=0Anotifications.=0A=0A> Kind regards,=0A> Eiji Tanioka