From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: fatihusta86@gmail.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 54418326 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6f300a85 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u48so90542842wrc.0 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [10.34.12.1] ([88.253.100.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u184sm13160783wmb.29.2017.03.20.04.55.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:55:28 -0700 (PDT) To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com From: Fatih USTA Subject: [Question] Is it posible layer 2 interface on wireguard Message-ID: <8d34928c-46e9-9f5c-5c77-1c40ece32c7d@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:55:19 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Yes, GRE over IPSEC possible, but I thought, Maybe built in supported on WIREGUARD. What do you think about usage WIREGUARD in BOND interface? -- Fatih USTA