From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C16DC43441 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4835A20823 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=mib-infotech-co-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@mib-infotech-co-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="CohMUrNr" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4835A20823 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mib-infotech.co.nz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c0a43ef7; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cc0eee5b for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 79fef415 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id t13so5752400pgr.11 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:47:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mib-infotech-co-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=gULWseEpPs0Tsa7o4CIJd9U8PA95T4YzOx906mTOwhc=; b=CohMUrNr0EQ8JwMN9CRJcB1gvVUuupaP5XOsUWIZCS5RoUVbl84pqu5M2U+n525YLn 8BkXTec74QxxMU0o6x7MNLwBwPibd11Lkhbz+3fYknbhF4YpI0ZQcMdTI1STDUcKySuM nOMGbKfbqAQdZJLxaftvSup2z7ZSw8AiLCZDdLw6AL+yJYr+JeH2Br4WXQuz5vyJFASH 4qhusEet0MIpcYjIIGO51GYXvX4lB5DR7X2l9tKTuT/NbnmZhyzC2GZNbmcsvEyWRcdV WsTDJ3i54w0+f+2NitizL5T/Ibf0VO3uooWtLINZY0aiAQh0R9/XhmWI1FhK518yI8BN tc2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=gULWseEpPs0Tsa7o4CIJd9U8PA95T4YzOx906mTOwhc=; b=Qy0rDH6XQ00ReqiE9XhA5W+Lb20kpWRIw6tXXBJXANXy4k/jfAJBomNrvPBZQ50BRp 9phrIHv04PBerFl8T5q+9d+9tf2Gqf6bfS93aBCoiZstbi2GK8NAWvPEzaHEY+xMakIW FS2E0n0MMzUmIwDSGiIbBacAqT/ahMY5sgRX1aKBaOcMl7qAQveSITFt5uoaC4wKAFEO fO1PL0hxeNY153rzXbUeVG7qUKeuLTBMUracqPs6glFA+dsB+x9ufsdomVYo7n+myKz0 oDPl52h21Y7qDL5AyRKETVgHsvdmMwRy+6jOnDYu8O9PrVncn8MAF1zPjaPmE5SvpbDY NEDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIsxKvc2AAxI/f656DqSIt51/Jv/U1FgeGCCaH77uwSwxPITULc V28kJPUku/Ycf1wNDNa2cUnEksODbCI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dl6xkDvJNS09y5xakSNa0KinOBm4PQTPby1WgS9vyKou9CLj/1fRXW3b+PgYttSG/zh2lDqg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f710:: with SMTP id x16mr21901389pgh.322.1542664034553; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:47:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.16.226.11] ([103.247.155.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm5499738pfb.34.2018.11.19.13.47.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:47:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: <020DC45A-7CA9-49E5-9A14-6300306F5476@lonnie.abelbeck.com> From: John Huttley Message-ID: <903807da-82a3-f97c-5ba3-510eca9af84f@mib-infotech.co.nz> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:47:10 +1300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <020DC45A-7CA9-49E5-9A14-6300306F5476@lonnie.abelbeck.com> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" And also 4433 which is used by DTLS https://wiki.wireshark.org/DTLS --dad On 20/11/18 9:53 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >> On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John wrote: >> >> Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my >> trial-and-error based approach? Wikipedia has an article that lists >> many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers). Any suggestions are >> welcomed. > Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T) > > > Lonnie > > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard