From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C053AC27C53 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 494bee54; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 7c94b8ad (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4217c7eb6b4so32438395e9.2 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718549975; x=1719154775; darn=lists.zx2c4.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:from:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5nFVWAj1H55wq/1xwOoSs4z313Hm8Ezzq44AA0HFJME=; b=mcJjB+ZsWFW9HNX3Hnq2hiw4C5puLDFl66zLylHYvYfhyf3Bzu5j2hBF2XgovcVgSC tmv+1ZW1eAgDbay5Ocila51p5UsCQB+3g5O5ozOgwyNreOs0edpVx5c8lsCGCutlZmW6 H2pN7/tPti/iTUI6LjlCRta9hqqDqZYv+6oBw81iGZ6F3fz58lDW3/otTtbfnFFhBtjs DH8okJiQVzmQFHqSi+lsDtb/k6GqnL6fWa9iLCZOZR+1Z/49UeFTXbs3+/lLw4b7zuMq 0UZApOB+5A6922Y3Cv8G401mndqzeoPHGvRIq995iPOknbXRkUCw2tgCO8HrTCUhMnsh ov4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718549975; x=1719154775; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:from:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5nFVWAj1H55wq/1xwOoSs4z313Hm8Ezzq44AA0HFJME=; b=UejBpHrSI0u5vRjXzJzV0FXebbtLKcstMeS0Eym77uszaU5hEW5xS/NnEuM0qOPkt/ o5Ss+S/PcZ+fBJsyF3tTSPkawf8R/85PrflmY/GTn8cx1n0H7JQHwNDF61WVW5QxHKXW tTujdlHaHAOyQzV7t0cxdeFsoY+7AdwUjkKodA+aW3uhgoFqLbsKFeP2klhijD7RTnkz Bu30eTzgI9MmUqAfLjRsCYvzQJlu+1AB+8yc6q4F6cNX3c1lRXTwH0XwaGTTqpOGV1sP 7H9Dd3DjuHi/kikBtcT6BblZUp48/y3yXlXDAFasAwtPFW3oP9b/mt1XAyuZCGBMZEhd Rm4Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWeoHYL7LMEW3E6fcj2nyMEGj/mil13FRml5D5dyEAynMYL7NMpeu/hw+pHKcZX7DOWXClU3lh8AkThLC1H5/Z/P8qahARilU8c X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzD9INU5LBl8OYZBfsqyO3bFy3OoXZw1/yjJ0yG685MGhlvHfSx 4X4uks13XGiJU6Qm8F6PKIfTiHxrFqy4J/S7m0vbrYZUIibkB3z6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqQ5S85SUn/5OmuW6k4yUM37CMmngxeKKeVLnCCe05e7uKXPPTuiMu2a2SDsl4bzzZ0cmn+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:808:b0:423:b756:cdaf with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-423b756ce01mr21616865e9.23.1718549975271; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.99] (93-48-172-72.ip258.fastwebnet.it. [93.48.172.72]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4229207d1a7sm98764785e9.1.2024.06.16.07.59.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jun 2024 07:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <93a15ab0-1cfc-4b39-97fe-64712eafb278@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:59:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Germano Massullo Subject: Re: Mini PCIE HW accelerator for ChaCha20 To: Max Schulze , WireGuard mailing list References: <78a56a8e-59d2-4948-a761-f1f1b3a6b26a@online.de> Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <78a56a8e-59d2-4948-a761-f1f1b3a6b26a@online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Il 16/06/24 15:47, Max Schulze ha scritto: > why do you think this is the bottleneck and at what speed are you hitting a limit? I get ~550 Mbit/s throughput in LAN between a Ryzen 5 3600 and the Turris Omnia which CPU goes to 100% load during iperf3 test