From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F837C2BBCA for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6e8b1da2; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wilbur.contactoffice.com (wilbur.contactoffice.com [212.3.242.68]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id a5e7ca3d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauth1.co-bxl (smtpauth1.co-bxl [10.2.0.15]) by wilbur.contactoffice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF61930D4; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:59:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1718791167; s=20220809-q8oc; d=unstable.cc; i=a@unstable.cc; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=yaOviF3mD5DKHn3gVsnVR952sfmn+vmjYhMoz3V51dI=; b=EewMJDJ0+PBPZGYI/REMXzhykUWPCTQh+izgUH9FJLpBHIFFWee09FFWdsv3mm48 THaGNL3jWb07ubN3k3ode/PVNohSk1vAOc+36hs6TOvSDArVWYQfyPWG8jSGNsKsOqZ cX3STD9MpVPLgwiD2UuY/7KNv/UiQsN8ATjnQhYjVs9tu8QluIoalwgdItDjw0GjEwW zLHAlmXa5qdnNUaOuwmnelhmtDLOZmhYwsGzY9bMNJOVruFK7bGk9ZPEJC9ZEcrRdtG zOo4LFd9a1AmbkJEtIhxmML4XtnOwbW7jgN9mBIVwFi2qFX9DVD/JKB2cjSTt1Uf8l0 QQw90KX0sA== Received: by smtp.mailfence.com with ESMTPSA ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9e91adb2-b155-4eef-8604-a2f762a98d4d@unstable.cc> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:01:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Wireguard broken with ip rule due to missing address binding To: Nico Schottelius , WireGuard mailing list References: <87h6dpi7zp.fsf@ungleich.ch> Content-Language: en-US From: Antonio Quartulli In-Reply-To: <87h6dpi7zp.fsf@ungleich.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ContactOffice-Account: com:375058688 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, On 19/06/2024 11:42, Nico Schottelius wrote: > I really hope the address binding issue can be solved soon, especially > giving there is already a patch for it available. Question: instead of implementing pure IP binding, may it help to implement some logic so that messages to a peer are always sent using the IP where previous packets were received? Cheers, -- Antonio Quartulli