Re: Structure(d) output of wg?

["Dan Lüdtke" <mail@danrl.com>]

Hi,

that would mean multiple calls to `wg` to get the desired structure =
filled, one for each [CATEGORY]. I can live with that, but was looking =
for a more efficient solution.

Cheers,

Dan

Nice bandwidth, though :)
=20
> On 14 Dec 2016, at 22:09, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Dan,
>=20
> This already exists. While `wg show wg0` gives some hipster colorized
> output, `wg show wg0 [CATEGORY]` gives very structured output meant
> for parsing with bash or grep or sed or cut or whatever you want. For
> example:
>=20
> [zx2c4@demo ~]$ sudo wg show wg0 bandwidth | tail
> l8gKhi5rvJChhDWHl+C7Ubj8hSHfW0HbkOOA9GQPL3Y=3D    13272   43056
> CpX3sUNoLSofE6V6X+uHnFqF5+g/fXwJeY6ploPbgV0=3D    9425    5785
> NkUUqbqhh+VV2IZYdAuVIdjpx0UopRRgO7hZju7+DW0=3D    145     89
> S3/UokM7yvoKCYOvGdyi0IiiqvrUWXsIX8FTSFl0i2E=3D    46101   152415
> FPqY/W8Z6LTgZLu69CqF1WtIPwUoG52pNNno4BRDtR0=3D    145     89
> ULFNzzUznzXzMrjRvWUlz9dQsIzEAtIG7o3s9oHRJHk=3D    145     89
> qbTrp7yhdqrvLnMg9kZNxNTd7FQRvV6jMr18G63zDhA=3D    13299   28787
> p0rDK1UEx7siGp061hekJFYkjTs3qY08TBaTfSk86TM=3D    5075    3434
> NZSZ7/JTraQ6eOseLIMQBo38cfQL8SXarfO/g99xYUI=3D    0       0
> pX7cS/weolOD5GKHhrNqtqKT4nZto50ZXczacQ5iklM=3D    95210   58850
>=20
> (Quit hoggin my bandwidth, yall ;-) )
>=20
> Jason