From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD39C56201 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70DA207BB for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:13:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C70DA207BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bestov.io Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cb57380c; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id bfd433f9 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:07:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: 79.52.27.94 Received: from localhost (host-79-52-27-94.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.52.27.94]) (Authenticated sender: pbl@bestov.io) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F65E40002; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "WireGuard mailing list" Subject: RE: Using WireGuard on Windows as non-admin - proper solution? From: "Riccardo Paolo Bestetti" To: "Clint Dovholuk" Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:10:29 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <8bf9e364f87bd0018dabca03dcc8c19b@mail.gmail.com> X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Wed Nov 25, 2020 at 6:57 PM CET, Clint Dovholuk wrote: > Out of curiosity - why not just use " S-1-5-4" Interactive - " A group > that > includes all users that have logged on interactively. Membership is > controlled by the operating system." > > If the user logged on - let the turn the tunnel on/off? Isn't this akin to having no permissions at all? Furthermore, I think the point of this feature is to give more fine-grained control to IT admins. Which it accomplishes, without introducing much complexity. Piece of beauty! Riccardo