From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B42C433ED for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A0D61177 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A5A0D61177 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ntrv.dk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9f5bd1c9; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-relay.contabo.net (mail-relay.contabo.net [161.97.176.84]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 9ae05d13 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pxmg2.contabo.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail-relay.contabo.net (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3A06B101052 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m14060.contaboserver.net (m14060.contabo.net [213.136.93.170]) by mail-relay.contabo.net (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8E3001012C0 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:21:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qv1-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]:39780) by m14060.contaboserver.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1ladlc-0007ys-9s for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:21:41 +0200 Received: by mail-qv1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 3so1202169qvp.6 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 05:21:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WGMjGmBA6Bw7GT0g/aYKbRMqydyDBrNrkmfYtFvfCtZ+CEdEp vhwqSsh2D5a3aKsUuGfjOgTcjKM3/AXMGkyZGV0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKN0DvqeYoQFAop191Kqju1LKfk+4ltRrq7qz27Py3bNsVqWTKxGlMH8FkFYYaPZo5WsNNe+7e4TjAzt+N8cc= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8c03:: with SMTP id n3mr5757600qvb.32.1619353299609; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 05:21:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0c8b4be5-ee9d-4f19-7179-ad08a28d0574.ref@yahoo.co.uk> <0c8b4be5-ee9d-4f19-7179-ad08a28d0574@yahoo.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <0c8b4be5-ee9d-4f19-7179-ad08a28d0574@yahoo.co.uk> From: Chriztoffer Hansen Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:21:02 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: wgX iface as slave to a bridge - Linux To: lejeczek Cc: WireGuard mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - m14060.contaboserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.zx2c4.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntrv.dk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: m14060.contaboserver.net: authenticated_id: ch@ntrv.dk X-Authenticated-Sender: m14060.contaboserver.net: ch@ntrv.dk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" > Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved by LInux bridge? I tried > but it did not work for me. Similarly "mavclan" - > would/should wireguard work that way? Why would you want to enslave an L3-only capable interface to an L2 bridge? What is your use case behind the question? -- Chriztoffer