From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D683FC2BA2B for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334D02076A for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="oaADC3Fy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 334D02076A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b0f56bdb; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id cd091c65 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 05:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id e5so4718118edq.5 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 22:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVZHULSPDFmLSNv+hmJcoGUCiIX6Lu6TwOdHjzl9mno=; b=oaADC3Fyz23NHEsSTGTwTYXtDlhbsf4U4viHYky0nhsPvkRPXpjwOwR/9ou0b66amR 4yRsmpzFVGusZmj53+CY517+mYmhKY/Uy9JeYfu+G5U3ZReDxWMGsRGXMH7du0AAGciD NmjmgGOSvYkTePTQVs6W1wwtWIUHFyo99qIbkwtP/65QAtU3vz6dgOi6CpEcbGj36plC 9znBoxGoGkhFhwl6FwxsPcYzuJC0jEaeLoSViuO+dJrWs7mhDnTMfSy9YpC3qvX58+P4 +clo/hkqdqgKWnO1Wb8JxJwLPWA4XXg8Ul88cGvEpBmeflZVjgJTxHLKjCL+wJMkRnY6 4SGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVZHULSPDFmLSNv+hmJcoGUCiIX6Lu6TwOdHjzl9mno=; b=LENMujPNdHsS3lW9AXjA9pEYQbfymqsBH7Zf1iuweNlICZZLvRiivxs8IFNrbNUtuU mXdLMxzFUGGpzBWKjF3kMyf1fL0d7irx0sTpcSdG/WOnKeTPsI45wMG4eOkCjZKmRiuV qeEoUDdUftNYWmfx9TIwG5SaohwwYu/Bas3srtX100X2KOJkM/xkP/ZONimPMkLGuLXq XGMTf4xnhTkH5Yz1M45/qZ+ezWhnXIY4HXI5cBvL3tlBg7fdxDPyCBuxNq/a4qzRrqU7 QQhS2JTDEBRsPEWAR31MMrsrEjdJoQ2jqrhSL8Au5OvGsuZZx36OI1d6d7ZBT15t4ipo IKqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubTChnzlTktoB3AMYn7y/J46JyqqvPBkOcq/xUgrCBXkBovwhJ1 bgNlojybnzZ2B7wjoM7klL/JehzGsqzrZv/NonI0Yc7FNXs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKnwe0ReYBlDT1SOLBiR4I7ClsaWKedbxqGiOD0M/Wgdx7s2ew2RQ3Qv/FnQnanJNbbEs+ltFUwurVlF7YDM/k= X-Received: by 2002:a50:ef09:: with SMTP id m9mr822308eds.321.1587273671468; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 22:21:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <59f5a401d768dfad8b60a0ed3f59a5b6@msfjarvis.dev> In-Reply-To: <59f5a401d768dfad8b60a0ed3f59a5b6@msfjarvis.dev> From: Eiji Tanioka Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:21:00 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about Crowdin operation To: WireGuard mailing list , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , me@msfjarvis.dev Cc: Simon Rozman , Roopesh Chander S Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Harsh, Jason, Thank you for quick response! > The second option is perfectly fine, though you'll have better luck if yo= u > mention me or Jason since that will ensure Crowdin does not swallow up th= e > notifications. > AFAICT, the "issue" flag sends us an email notification, which is a > good thing if you need an answer. I understood. When I use comments is when I need a response, so I will try to use the mention or issue flag. 2020=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8819=E6=97=A5(=E6=97=A5) 5:24 Harsh Shandilya : > > April 19, 2020 1:38 AM, "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:56 AM Eiji Tanioka wro= te: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm translating WireGuard apps into Japanese. > >> I have a question about operation in Crowdin. > >> > >> When translate, we translators need to clarify about original string's > >> context or meaning. In that situation, which option is preferred? > >> > >> - send ML about question. > >> - in Crowdin, use comment. > >> - in Crowdin, use comment and flag "Issue". > >> - in Crowdin, use Discussion. > >> > >> # I had used second option, but never mention to anyone. > >> # Should I had to mention to ? > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Eiji Tanioka > > > > Hey Eiji, > > > > CC'ing Harsh, Simon, and Roopesh, as they might have different > > opinions on what they prefer. > > > > From my end, any form of communication is fine, whether its on Crowdin > > or on the mailing list, because lowering the barrier for people to > > volunteer their hours translating strings for us seems like a good > > thing. > > Same goes for me, I'll take whatever's the easiest route for translators > and work with it. > > > I suppose one advantage of Crowdin is that the discussions are placed > > beside the translations, which makes it easy for future people to > > correlate the two, and most discussions tend to be clarifications on > > particular strings, rather than interesting technical conversation > > that would benefit from the archiving afforded by mailing lists. > > > > AFAICT, the "issue" flag sends us an email notification, which is a > > good thing if you need an answer. > > > > Jason > > > Harsh Shandilya