From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B10C38A29 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A839221D93 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fe8+0uRQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A839221D93 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 166e100e; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id c2413b5c (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id q8so4006759eja.2 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0w9OQjt9JudhSuh06JVepQUx0/jYiv5I31i5CbBmfyg=; b=fe8+0uRQO4RnGPsIfJXOGdjTXzWGzssuDk5xvyykZJ0gZ8uOIlEF9AGd9Uw8PDfD3o qXa5kjxQn8tx0QbV2iG1C52z7NVQZ1Zxmgi0gtIa8tz7vFdc9r95dn7mZ4eqT1kfkPcM 5k4FHjeCYzIHZWflDB6TgEBcIJuWJXXmrkW9ih+NqDMM8FGo4RxNVRqIRWeqwLc+CFlZ kDD5F7sUGx1nzkxT3cmb4eaJFFXj9rF6QgpLtpS0bdSXGznhDTVZ7lRXNd6y37uxAnIA p4B52ujtZtG5wd8gSeRpPK9HgpPQVy4EhyVWS43+zdWL1bsUR5zvEkIBLkVweeREpb1y Z/MQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0w9OQjt9JudhSuh06JVepQUx0/jYiv5I31i5CbBmfyg=; b=Agj3+9DNUFuQEbwITTlaTvbj6jH5+ckJVDZ26SoEEbIzpweFhkDE2Chxj47uNl+NZ4 TukIpOYR0+v6qpL0ppXxRN8soIJ9SUess8iWd6w5BEBv6GfmRE+dvdapBmU4q3Y6+4BB /LC9wugQ6yuvCPAWFYCCOxjsjD4xz7ZS6ujaObZ3arfcxCAHl07A2GO3dRSWXsDvpts6 ea5aWlhe8kqvAF2MAdw6Y3jCWJeRtCYWnDF7P5khL0/EwNZpcojzBwaJYkmO4Mk939pr AhZo/NpQuoWe2UDyheTAf+JhjjK+ePbIQmiqGaL0tRRpjadIuxbsyfsGcwLRZ0lzEyzM ZOBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub1MFZJH8zuYx6VOncx3BlWOW6Yaq7gmmTB7uRkbtb2k7DxhNWW QNlcd+imgrOAjrDwYBJyED0hDsCT9CtdXreiCpz3dt4hq84= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJyAmY0u6bdqP2gRmDibKOAHMRYcx6v3Ljx+pMSN/NpiKKEllWa3hvQfvflMaPholcEHe32hC0VJbn8O9V8iMA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d20e:: with SMTP id w14mr8086040ejz.19.1587225356584; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:55:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Eiji Tanioka Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 00:55:45 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Question about Crowdin operation To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, I'm translating WireGuard apps into Japanese. I have a question about operation in Crowdin. When translate, we translators need to clarify about original string's context or meaning. In that situation, which option is preferred? - send ML about question. - in Crowdin, use comment. - in Crowdin, use comment and flag "Issue". - in Crowdin, use Discussion. # I had used second option, but never mention to anyone. # Should I had to mention to ? Kind regards, Eiji Tanioka