From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: nicolas.prochazka@gmail.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 61a1c6bc for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f175.google.com (mail-ot0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 082419b9 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t31so89776568ota.1 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:55:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nicolas.prochazka@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: From: nicolas prochazka Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 16:55:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multiple wireguard interface and kworker ressources To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello again, with 0.0.20170613 , i can reproduce a big kworker cpu time consumption Regards, nicolas 2017-06-13 14:48 GMT+02:00 Jason A. Donenfeld : > Hi Nicolas, > > I'll look into this. However, you need to update WireGuard to the > latest version, which is 0.0.20170613. I can't provide help for > outdated versions. > > Jason