From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E40CC433F5 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 79b67119; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) by lists.zx2c4.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id 2b578fce (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c15so14644260ljr.9 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mkI/iMlTi8h78uskdeC14d0gj/jksLpcfIiVcU0xZek=; b=a2dMcB8pBGiCT6dH9djrjLc6UuhW/vdqJgrm4BxTpwokZRIC4HVKT8AfLSMsQqZikm 9Wb725GWeDfREDuaqvJzKIipObGY1SnHVyxjLAerEhbeHyH3wRCsANH5HKEBHF1I3KeH rFksp/mRPG1H5scVDaG6xXwgS8iDcXUFE7W+4ThwDItuIaGHdizveuRfr+BhRnj3twou vcGPTcHWLK2OVBlJYBItlbvtiwmsUoInSM+Fmw5g+K2ORWhjqI+ctyelkkUsmYjlPKhN pJDC6n1dUuFsNOpG7kdD5G4VY+1/kIf81hOdXSexmeVQtUPQv77WilCHJ3o2MkZo/eKS zNKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mkI/iMlTi8h78uskdeC14d0gj/jksLpcfIiVcU0xZek=; b=0cwvNFbL5q3lxkhJiLFueMCkaxTrkjzDDlgjlunGCf8ucJMNqhpkfvuc3a+M5AJxuo gF0ioS/S9gCyNvt8J3pArBSIVVA7xgEhk0h6svLW6dgbc+hJ0dWT3CWbcwPVZPCmoo/w IZwEWa0hsSAbNJ1blyNRWLk28ysjNE/1oz64kmuSWXhS0EtPubGmzCwXp8Q5gRxfBxPl Ba3EBuTuQoZE5T4KMX3ZStS1Y+OqVYEO6vkkv8isBJ0/GtczAWVihcejUnTsJ3+isIAB uqpcVk8EScm5LX+d/WwhJNT/Ll8zLzI8HZiUJYYbsQQpW3J9UiN90nS9aAn3wPSvQC4n 5geg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eouZlRFenZvPYhI8xoQy6unJ3jacQCqUVPSdclVXNzxbj2KiO CFLnA8MfwK+Ca1F/kc8MeaG8aqmbVkZgU8zrBNHl1lLI X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnROrZw4ByX4HVOLIuQiqrrvZZ7EDm3WMU4Y2zemF4ce4xisX9IqB1Y6f3kqUb/lbUfQUT5nizdF7kenmJ894= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:bf1d:0:b0:247:dea7:f657 with SMTP id c29-20020a2ebf1d000000b00247dea7f657mr66648ljr.454.1649108103877; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 14:35:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Devanath S Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:34:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: wireguard performance To: WireGuard mailing list , "Jason A. Donenfeld" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi All, We were trying to test the performance of wireguard on GCP and found it around 1G for TCP and around 500-800 for UDP. Plz do let us know if there are any ways to UP this performance. Any suggestion is appreciated. Regards Dev