From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85A1C48BE6 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA83261289 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:53:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA83261289 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7a9b54b8; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 45a28063 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 07:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id ce15so15027264ejb.4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uTWnWG4Ar80Ad+qpkm/noTBoE2DA24wS7NjLW0STf8k=; b=kH0/uwIPiwy02s15n4s9RoshyVm1H6D0qjY0Z6O8ZlmH3vqwhEYPg++QFGBnL73+xn aSyz2Hs9ujLgH8HpT8moKrj42KP40oBbwuS/skDBzv1M0FwiIy6ZgVl53YSrFnNPVSKN xSRufddBADn3a2YGWtC2PcaWh/gSHiK8Jp+CVbtC7SE9Zbq6wdfMQWmwcSOfqkrdX3vW kEfhDSkd/2Y2TbgKZldeQiUexu3goaGMkN/iQN+QqieNMSOw3w4WcTb81ntdB4jIlUnE R287kenoI4uNQomKKOyVmDZ6TGLj3ljugaxq/7xILda0L89ujttzkOBxLboHwbjLL0fh cSGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uTWnWG4Ar80Ad+qpkm/noTBoE2DA24wS7NjLW0STf8k=; b=N51OhXT1j8zwpF1nRmBg6PmYVyy7ooWWJdB2PQWWpfP+Rnx5+d0zGxpkmItbifptsB rMuC7/4DFI8Nbeex53GnY82po9j8xXsV4EkAE7JIcqCfO0urri8kwvH2NQQ9AoEJVuxV Eqk9yo3hPaAdaUYFuXBiUYNE67YmtVEQEPFZEN44wG27OQM023rv3OqK5qZy5L9nlRqM UgYlAZMTQnNhg2dEFnxuS0VWn40HUYBPeGbaShRqezbnYcuuucZ6IGvxhcYc0QsmL3fi seg/7xKfP51BD4tHRNLVDUXAFVzoVCZqZ1NSlHks0aRAOqz19QHrwl3ZDw/uonk28k+A JTcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ALxR7DApdflZ1YuZBTDv1tt1qQTlW48FSyAUrYJIdCI5/40Yv 2V8vDtv9HXBwacBeAbSw/HhlVsep+G3gTC/s14W9FLSpg+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzJFf5hOMbUrkY9yahJVcWWhmX0OAvcolGzyEYzVWiwls3g+5JWcv1c6C97LPFdzLQJ9itb3Iou22Z8Ma1aqI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e01:: with SMTP id l1mr14236448eji.280.1623657090792; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:51:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dimitar Vassilev Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:51:19 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openwrt interface does not have a public key after upgrade from librecmc 1.4.8 to openwrt 21.02-rc2 to openwrt 21.02-rc2 ath79 To: WireGuard mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" =D0=9D=D0=B0 =D0=BF=D1=82, 11.06.2021 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 9:23 =D1=87. Dimitar V= assilev =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0: > > Greetings, > I upgraded an WNDR3800 from librecmc 1.4.8/ath71 to openwrt 21.02-rc2 > ath79 and reapplied the librecmc 1.4.8 configuration. I'm seeing now > the interface configuration in the CLI and in Luci with all the keys, > but when I click on Status->Wireguard I get a message interface does > not have a public key. > I did have a look on > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/wireguard-interface-does-not-have-a-public-ke= y/37549 > and the other threads, but even when after applying the work-arounds > for DNS rebind protection still the same. My Luci is using self-signed > certs as well. > Any clues where to look further? I will be testing the device today to > see how it really works. I do have some overlapping IP ranges in the > configs that make me reluctant to test how site A machine works as a > client of site B, while the actual site A is running remotely over the > VPN. > Thanks, > Dimitar For the record - this is a cosmetics issue in my case. Once I put the uplink cable all came good. Disconnecting the VPN interface to avoid greater worries also helps [tm] Thanks, Dimitar