From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D30C433DB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595E3229C4 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:57:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 595E3229C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id a7c76ae1; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 15976ad8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id w12so28621357ilm.12 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:56:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MSikxOjkaxmACalJRRw+uU8gYi7hd380ZZ5a831ySG4=; b=USzDOlDKh1HKWRjmj8OnKa0YzBQ2i6VSwMx2hKQE5Zx44K4XXmT4iL5DFT2CQtC2FG tfdOPNbW2m1cafiVvU3vkCj4GJ9qhM2M6cy5w+M+C/Ywzf6lKhx02VY/pQlQsD/fAl8V lNHEcTzzeS2v657+C/1N1wuzO88wwErkz7UHjnLwjJ26wHkxqySK7dqzpneBscORjVWN 5iZ91JqMnDux7LaDg7NQ86Iq2t4KoxmgQfn8M4kqEOGXCDLfLz0AjW/rRIFlw/K22ENN 9+ZuMOvf2+OAiyTtbZDWd8MEewaepZKAjOqoCyW5VAs1ItfDNE0TWVi4bi7FW9607pGb C2ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MSikxOjkaxmACalJRRw+uU8gYi7hd380ZZ5a831ySG4=; b=BZIa2rrmpMozLwl1SF6xO2hxLK9Y2C+KzTUEo0WbL8w/K8nNPAMvvSYHz+96O/bo99 b8hZsPlpucQcGqcHqUIgqOpPEbGITErHNm9gyc+3NxluLNySvMwY3E6DvK98R8ktRjg8 aliNLTt5f3LEoug5oShTIQxP+NQ7c09dqafrEzt/qnXoijCwVi9pzxKv3d9mFFBNzKhM /qpz+yOp0PMTQWkPc/PZ2w3d5t4CtTX0JxLlcUXQjkkLyB9vycWgeJXW+qZJoX9QHI5d fyVOJX4ugPP0njp7LKkCLiFAtUgv5vSn2/HCRDUej/gf+VBjlFmJEMs4mVnql5aKYzWM 5z9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312gfWot9qWvvaSk76Ra8CHg2t0Q+3/jlvEUV2KybBQ6zsGKqJO eWPPrTnWMiyC2/OtVXpeUlPTJ+bybkjPEBkNQouNIlwz X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBoypjJUSYVstRG9IdSTPlbDDfsZruNnrjyXPZr6dNCMJ/X8zW2ih8EXaN/ii1fKRWGLANFc9oNFuIsOz6YGU= X-Received: by 2002:a92:9881:: with SMTP id a1mr77304747ill.238.1609854982033; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 05:56:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <176cafeade8.27b6.fd5e59abeac6319e4fe4e8192ea7d08d@solidadmin.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jeffrey Walton Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 08:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wireguard not available for CentOS Stream To: Silvan Nagl Cc: WireGuard mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:06 AM Silvan Nagl wrote: > > Thank you for this information. > Since Stream is more or less like a very old Fedora version now I am > convinced using Fedora Server wont be that bad at all. > > Gonna test it soon. Yeah, I think you'll like it. I got tired of dicking around with all the breaks and workarounds caused by Red Hat and CentOS antique software. I also did not feel comfortable with abandoned kernels. I don't understand how Red Hat or CentOS can provide a 2.6 or 3.10 kernel in good conscience. Even the kernel folks tell you to use a modern kernel, because those old kernels get no attention. The new kernels get the bug fixes and security updates (and include the bug fixes of the old kernels). Jeff