From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDC9C433ED for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1C09608FC for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:17:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A1C09608FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sneits.fi Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 14b3f55f; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 96b60530 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id n8so34743108lfh.1 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:58:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sneits-fi.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mv1FFckR+8W6ZZ4k2qvvRuf6fgFJew6Z2Qg+eravbnA=; b=eodQL2lk2p2pwm/aKfmcW4zTPGp0b5Owmdw91SOLkPWFr+1RCEKsg3XG/X9nCf5oQn 8q0fR4rYoHsWC2V4RQEwP32K4mMMIAtMbqFsNcqBQxsx0//blPC6v0mtHaQrWg414gXS V1dODeyXLoPOe5g7XqxqTSGBn+Y+SaZz2DFb+21XdmJzLZ1dhnJxLkLbGrEHg2TYR87m +qDhHkd9yuM9YAtKDNIfK7FldEzK8nnnAjjV+v9O9oF0j1+e5itXxvOmmZJikWExqfPc UsFkuawhnCvMtqEFfA72xvAbvi2ql3WhWElOhpnshVg9HtHRzNOE5jfX1wB4eKBpdUEh ZwYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mv1FFckR+8W6ZZ4k2qvvRuf6fgFJew6Z2Qg+eravbnA=; b=jXEVvCGiuv4ty2WagijBtzbIiOPsMgo5jZWex1pyEPN1rEAbEVJvM7qZQQcAwv5xJZ E+O5rXMO6Blx93CKpdNvd8WxchtgeaVn5Odtn59ckWuGZoZBFz2R9fiiLlQcu6fdtUxp s0RXy8Yc9/KA1Ev/shTd7QdZ+eWbsb58cs5+OggTZ5gumvLEFbPm7m9d8k7nJSuMyeqk ehNGC/YKVN+L/V8MJTX7hEqtdHy/vteE+lX5m1p4mYEItpcH2BDsCpUHpByugIMSurqu PgM155PSM5bIwj7U37tHZE+yZ9PcF6UzIPoglplQK8NZreqSR8NAcBnc09W9eHf01YBr xJjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531c8MCos40HfblX50PbGOcnzCvw++ZwTuD+j3GxfQyvOZ7C3QMe vr15mAYT5vgpttx43mb4eczskK6InL9tA/kfoNasooI0dU54SHAE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxukq7xrSuQAN5fF0fJt6I2koGL/vzqgqRZ4a99sHNcfAU0JvQ5epxrokfmFyUs18N7rDzs6tEZ8boF33sPGLY= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4c04:: with SMTP id t4mr27273342lfq.641.1618423125715; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:58:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Osku Sneits Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:00:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: freebsd - cpu consumption? To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:17:33 +0000 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Dear all, has anyone else noticed the CPU consumption on FreeBSD kernel Wireguard? For my test link, there is a net speed of 200 Mbit/s. On esxi based host, transferring inside Wireguard tunnel, full speed takes about 90% of xeon d-1541 host. Doing this on CentOS 7, takes less than 20% of the same host.