From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 888851c1 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e201e192 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2ad62e11 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 68aee04b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v64-v6so11509171otb.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:25:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 00:25:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces To: Christophe-Marie Duquesne Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: gruetzkopf , WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Chirstophe, Thanks for writing this. Very cool work. As part of GSoC this summer, Martin (CC'd) is going to be working on a dynamic provisioning protocol over IPv6. One of the things we'll be investigating is whether it's best to derive a v6 address from a public key or whether it's best to make these separate/unrelated and share them alongside the public key. While the former is much more elegant, a significant problem is choosing the right behavior and assessing the security concerns with collisions. Do let me know if you'd like to join in the fun in trying to work out those problems. It looks to me like you've already begun with this nice tool here. Jason