From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6e62e04a for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id fe68267a for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4d67ebaa for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 4f865b1a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w94so10740550ioi.7 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 06:24:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:24:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [wireguard-dev] Ability to use one udp port for multiple wg interfaces To: nicolas prochazka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:14 PM, nicolas prochazka wrote: > "historical" private software, and it's difficult to deal with. > It is not a wireguard issue. In that case, I'd recommend you bind your services to 0.0.0.0 and just use iptables to do net-based ACLs with the standard filter table.