From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 642ff38b for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 61aad9d5 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d8d2a61e for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id a8b5304a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id k101so11788539iod.0 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:36:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [wireguard-dev] Ability to use one udp port for multiple wg interfaces To: nicolas prochazka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , There shouldn't be any massive issue with sharing your public key between customers. Just keep your private keys private.