From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 87bdf191 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b8831a11 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id c9ddff76 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i5so163391297wmg.0 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 05:15:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <382aed3a-349c-d518-16ae-3fdd8b1127f8@viisauksena.de> References: <101056cc-e944-a049-f194-c61567a1dcf1@viisauksena.de> <382aed3a-349c-d518-16ae-3fdd8b1127f8@viisauksena.de> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:15:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: WireGuard mailing list , Matthias Schiffer , n3ph , jens Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [WireGuard] Fwd: wireguard comparing to fastd - tests List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Please reply on list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: jens Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:51 AM Subject: Re: [WireGuard] wireguard comparing to fastd - tests To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" thx, thats true ... we were mostly interested in comparing speed in similar setups that we would deploy. But you ' re right - reducing workload from 20 to 12 in cypher make them not directly comparable -- make the world nicer, please use PGP encryption