From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3f625368 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d4fcab8e for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 9513547b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t196so196158273lff.3 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:37:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: To: Matt Redfearn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner , WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK? List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Matt, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Matt Redfearn wrote: > > I don't see a reason not to do this - I'm taking a look into it. Great thanks! This is good to hear. If you go into the arch/ directory and simply grep for "irq_stack", you can pretty easily base your implementation on a variety of other architectures' implementations. Jason