From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 501d6698 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id a05c9f86 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 86f7711a for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id ddf07312 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 76so10473104ith.0 for ; Sun, 06 Aug 2017 13:22:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170806210237.4dbbed42@msi.defcon1> References: <20170806210237.4dbbed42@msi.defcon1> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:22:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Many users To: Bzzzz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hey Jean-Yves, There's an artificial limitation of 65535 peers per interface. This limitation isn't _entirely_ necessary, and if it becomes a problem for folks, I could remove it. There was somebody on this list who set up thousands of peers and thousands of interfaces a while ago, and after handling some issues with him, things worked pretty well. So, to answer your question: WireGuard should scale quite well, and you shouldn't have many problems. But of course let me know if you do. Jason