From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8bb0fefc for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c592c0d3 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 848c84b7 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id fd3318b6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w10so24935793oif.0 for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 03:30:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 12:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ability to use one udp port for multiple wg interfaces To: Damian Kaczkowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Damian Kaczkowski wrote: > True. But I still think that ability to assign multi interfaces to one udp > port would be handy. Eg when one want to use only specific and limited ports > (like eg 53) for wireguard but still wants to have more interfaces at one's > disposal. Possible use case - be able to easily assign and group various > peers to different interfaces and monitor those interfaces parameters > (exposed eg by kernel) using monitoring tools capable of collecting various > information/data and/or plotting graphs like bandwidth, traffic, and so on. > This info could be later used for analysing or debugging. No, you're doing it wrong. Those monitoring use cases you mentioned are already taken care of by the existing design. If you need help with a particular configuration or setup, you're free to ask about those particular use cases. But what you've asked so far simply isn't the WireGuard way of doing things; we offer here a better design than that. > Reading through the docs. > > I come to scenario where I would like to disable whole allowed-ips thing. Then either you're doing things horribly wrong, or WireGuard isn't the tool for you. AllowedIPs is the essential concept. If you have questions about how to reach a particular goal, we can help you. But I believe this particular conversation has reached a dead end.