From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFDDC3E8C5 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A24A220771 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="Gh+aFvqR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A24A220771 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zx2c4.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cf0a2e74; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.zx2c4.com (mail.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id f5174622 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 22a9f183 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=4l1nIV0S8jE6jEIVXrCA/j6djyc=; b=Gh+aFv qRONoI7pFwL9Om0p4bJsPxC7Z+oNght746EZBs8e48UvIhRHXBwMPjFNjLR27SW0 yOIzZ9P28VfjrsaToyVmPSnp+nUw5tl7ooFfABQatiaCPnQ/2nfdcwOscgc0pqb8 ngnUcMeTiXreCy9LU7MwJtAb/d7KGZ2SnYGRv0A5CPTjwWDkOqibomZq6cpluqUH 3I5y2PHtJoNgh+hpUTxiIN40/7zVwrt0xdPkooR2FRQJtLLtAaS0lOg+jE36bMBG eAhjMN26YQiXOlqGp9Yqf87vjmnHVbLo/X/LLahCgA5Zub9sU2Myppun1UU61Gd7 wrmu8fqJug9Z6U+Q== Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id c42072b3 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id t33so8706749ybd.0 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 02:52:42 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TpZcPnGXbyi/6AiLW+/Q7U6MdUqVzIjglJopoz/oDWGwnWBq6 yfsdlI29gELJYcw/l3cIJn9+SNJL+wOYYpGPgMY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxJ+KhLoK/Bg1S5PY0v/dsK0qSip6fGo9vwsoG7ZJ/65TDkZjc5fOPa88xlk3tgUW7k2mkawFy0iJ1fe/1198= X-Received: by 2002:a25:2054:: with SMTP id g81mr22701490ybg.178.1606647161648; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 02:52:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:7110:2cd:b029:2f:52a5:c7b2 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 02:52:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3b4f9ec2-2f50-25c9-0e27-7ca0d2f16943@maidenheadbridge.com> References: <8bf9e364f87bd0018dabca03dcc8c19b@mail.gmail.com> <3b4f9ec2-2f50-25c9-0e27-7ca0d2f16943@maidenheadbridge.com> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 11:52:41 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using WireGuard on Windows as non-admin - proper solution? To: Adrian Larsen Cc: Clint Dovholuk , Riccardo Paolo Bestetti , WireGuard mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" >>> One thing that is commonly implemented in other clients >> That sounds like it introduces a security vulnerability > Yes, it is I don't mean to be rude, but shouldn't the line of thought sort of come to a natural end there? We're trying very hard not to be in the business of creating security vulnerabilities, after all.