From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0d2c5819 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4a21c1bc for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5a251c3d for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 23:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 1e130c14 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 23:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g71so19277159ioe.5 for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:21:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 01:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: trouble installing on Fedora and CentOS To: Joe Doss Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Joe, Could you look into Adam's issue with your package? Adam, Can you provide the full output of whatever is behind "warning: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 1"? Is there a debug switch to get more verbose logs? Why not install this directly from copr? Additionally, why are you installing 0629? That package is very old. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jdoss/wireguard/ Jason On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:58 PM, adam souzis wrote: > > I've been impressed with Wireguard, its design has helped simplify the im= plementation of a distributed sandbox app I am building quite a bit. But I = have had mixed results getting it running on different distributions. > > The good news is that I can report that I was able to build, install and = run Wireguard on CoreOs. > > The bad news is I was unable to get Wireguard working on either CentOS 7,= Fedora 26 or Fedora 25 (running these on AWS), it doesn't appear to be ins= talling the kernel module properly. > > Here's what I see when install the RPM: > > + dkms add -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q --rpm_safe_upgrade > > + dkms build -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q > > + dkms install -m wireguard -v 0.0.20170629 -q > > D: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch): waitpid(14760) rc = 14760 status 100 > > warning: %post(wireguard-dkms-1:0.0.20170629-2.fc25.noarch) scriptlet fai= led, exit status 1 > > Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package wireguard-dkms > > > Looks like it might have worked: > > [fedora@ip-1~]$ sudo dkms status > > wireguard, 0.0.20170629: added > > BUT: > > [fedora@ip-1 ~]$ sudo ip link add dev wg0 type wireguard > > RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported > > I tried this on the latest version of the RPM and this earlier version. I= also tried compiling it from source on Fedora but make failed early on. > > I disabled selinux, verified the kernel config is good and manually enabl= ed udp_tunnel for good measure. Any other suggestions? (I did see an earlie= r post here recommending using kernel-ml for centos 7 but I need to use the= Atomic Host variant and swapping out the kernel on that is non-trivial. I = was hoping using a recent Fedora would solve the kernel compatibility issue= s.) > > thank you! > Adam > =E1=90=A7 > > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard >