Wireguard-rs implementation

Wireguard-rs implementation

[Claude Richoux]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 420 bytes --]

Hi there,
I am reimplementing the noise protocol, and I decided to test against
wireguard-rs to check my KDFs. After some confusion, I noticed that the
Blake2s HMAC function is incorrect (it disagrees with pycryptodome,
openssl, and Cloudflare's BoringTun implementation). I guess I'm just
wondering what the status is on wireguard-rs? I saw it on git, so I assumed
it was working, but maybe not?
Thanks!
Claude Richoux

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 480 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Re: Wireguard-rs implementation

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:47 AM Claude Richoux <crichoux@janestreet.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I am reimplementing the noise protocol, and I decided to test against wireguard-rs to check my KDFs. After some confusion, I noticed that the Blake2s HMAC function is incorrect (it disagrees with pycryptodome, openssl, and Cloudflare's BoringTun implementation). I guess I'm just wondering what the status is on wireguard-rs? I saw it on git, so I assumed it was working, but maybe not?

Mathias is hard at work on wireguard-rs, so there are likely all sorts
of broken or unfinished things in there. The good news is that its
development finally has some great momentum. The not as good news is
that you'll have to wait a tad bit longer for it to be complete.

https://www.wireguard.com/repositories/ has the status of each of our
projects, by the way.
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard