From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3c39de17 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3746bf76 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 2175a9a1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p16so103129186qta.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <44DAF4D4-00A8-4903-8003-EB0215635B61@danrl.com> References: <44DAF4D4-00A8-4903-8003-EB0215635B61@danrl.com> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:49:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dan_L=C3=BCdtke?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack? List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hey Dan, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dan L=C3=BCdtke wrote: > Hi Jason, > >> I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but.... why? It's a demo. > > Because it is a demo of a brand new protocol, showing how it can be used = with legacy versions payload and transport protocol. I find that odd, but a= s I understand we have contradicting point of views on IP protocols. I see what you mean. That's a fair point. We might as well give people an opportunity for trying things out, indeed. Currently the scripts on the server don't support that, so I'll have to write a small bit of code, but it shouldn't be too bad. I'll circle back in a few weeks. Jason