From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 98542244 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d6b02424 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 798c48f0 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c13so8912873lfg.0 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 03:42:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20161102103158.5305-1-Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:42:52 +0100 Message-ID: To: Marc-Antoine Perennou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] [PATCH] tools: allow better build system configuration List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Okay, I thought that might be the case. That's the situation on Gentoo too. Secondly, why the pkg-config abstraction? When is it not called pkg-config and when is it not in PATH?