Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Frank Wayne <frank.wayne@northwestern.edu>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Windows Log Output to Event Viewer or Text File
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:02:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rMPgJ3E82nLoXyFYDT7DyjkLsdV3ange9sd_Qm+1-BNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR05MB79629688EB84BF07A2AEF54F99B89@PH0PR05MB7962.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Frank,

From what I can see, none of what you've written describes what's
lacking in a potential command that would tail the wireguard log and
print it to standard out, perpetually. At least I couldn't figure it
out from a close read. As I wrote before, you could then pipe this
into event log or into any place else. You spoke more about why
snapshotted logs are problematic, and I'm inclined to agree with you
for a few reasons (though not the one you mentioned). But what I'm
suggesting is a tail mode, that keeps spitting out new logs as they
arrive. Are pipes problematic? Is there no ingestor that reads data
from stdin that would be convenient to you? Where does the tail
approach fall short? Does the message-based approach of event log
clash with the line-based approach of wireguard's unix-like logs? I
would like to fully understand what about this approach fails to meet
your design criteria.

One thing we could pretty easily do is add a "WireGuardEventLogger"
service, {un,}installable with:

> wireguard /installeventlogger
> wireguard /uninstalleventlogger

which would then scoop up the binary log as it grows and spit it out
to event logger, in real time. This wouldn't be too hard to do.
However, I would really like to first understand precisely what the
shortcomings would be in a simpler tail subcommand. That seems a lot
more versatile and simpler to implement too.

Thanks,
Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-14 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-08 20:50 Frank Wayne
2021-10-08 22:01 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-10-12 21:39   ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-12 21:40     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-10-13 13:29       ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-13 18:16         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-10-14 17:41           ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-14 18:40             ` StarBrilliant
2021-10-14 19:40               ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-14 19:52               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-10-14 20:02             ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2021-10-14 21:45               ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-14 21:56                 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-10-15 13:25                   ` Frank Wayne
2021-10-26 10:05                     ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHmME9rMPgJ3E82nLoXyFYDT7DyjkLsdV3ange9sd_Qm+1-BNw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=frank.wayne@northwestern.edu \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).