Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network
@ 2020-10-09 12:18 David Wibergh
  2020-10-09 12:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Wibergh @ 2020-10-09 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wireguard

Hi everyone,

Sorry for bothering you, but we do have an Android specific question. When using the official WireGuard app on Android (v1.0.20200927), as well as our own, on certain device types we have issues reaching local devices in the network, even if we exclude private IPs. It works entirely fine on other device models though. I have tried on several different wireless networks & different subnets (192.168.0.1/24, 192.168.0.1/16, 10.220.0.1/16), as well as reaching various devices.

So far, we have had issues on OnePlus HD1903 & Samsung Galaxy S10e (model number SM-G970F).


Network
I have three devices in the wireless network (10.220.1.1/16).

1. Samsung Galaxy S10e (10.220.0.2)
2. Macbook (10.220.0.1)
3. Lenovo thinkpad (10.220.1.7)

On the S10e, I can not ping 10.220.0.1 nor 10.220.1.7 when connected.

On the Macbook, I can ping 10.220.1.7 when connected.


Configurations

Macbook uses following config:

[Interface]
PrivateKey = XXX
Address = 172.20.196.X/32, fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:X:1a60/128
DNS = 46.227.67.134, 192.165.9.158

[Peer]
PublicKey = 0CvxLBss+WQyJqidXRUnd5iO9gMJwMFNPidg09d4Onk=
AllowedIPs = ::/0, 0.0.0.0/5, 8.0.0.0/7, 11.0.0.0/8, 12.0.0.0/6, 16.0.0.0/4, 32.0.0.0/3, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/3, 160.0.0.0/5, 168.0.0.0/6, 172.0.0.0/12, 172.32.0.0/11, 172.64.0.0/10, 172.128.0.0/9, 173.0.0.0/8, 174.0.0.0/7, 176.0.0.0/4, 192.0.0.0/9, 192.128.0.0/11, 192.160.0.0/13, 192.169.0.0/16, 192.170.0.0/15, 192.172.0.0/14, 192.176.0.0/12, 192.192.0.0/10, 193.0.0.0/8, 194.0.0.0/7, 196.0.0.0/6, 200.0.0.0/5, 208.0.0.0/4, 46.227.67.134/32, 192.165.9.158/32
Endpoint = vpn90.prd.erfurt.ovpn.com:9929


Samsung Galaxy S10e uses the following config:

[Interface]
Address = X/32, fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:e827:X/128
DNS = 46.227.67.134, 192.165.9.158
PrivateKey = XXX

[Peer]
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/5, 8.0.0.0/7, 11.0.0.0/8, 12.0.0.0/6, 16.0.0.0/4, 32.0.0.0/3, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/3, 160.0.0.0/5, 168.0.0.0/6, 172.0.0.0/12, 172.32.0.0/11, 172.64.0.0/10, 172.128.0.0/9, 173.0.0.0/8, 174.0.0.0/7, 176.0.0.0/4, 192.0.0.0/9, 192.128.0.0/11, 192.160.0.0/13, 192.169.0.0/16, 192.170.0.0/15, 192.172.0.0/14, 192.176.0.0/12, 192.192.0.0/10, 193.0.0.0/8, 194.0.0.0/7, 196.0.0.0/6, 200.0.0.0/5, 208.0.0.0/4, ::/0, 46.227.67.134/32, 192.165.9.158/32
Endpoint = vpn11.prd.kista.ovpn.com:9929
PublicKey = p4s2SuFgKgWnV56Uh3yCx6ZWnaVyFXegV9FQqv670So=


Is this an issue you’re aware of? Is there anything else needed from me?

Thanks,
David Wibergh



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network
  2020-10-09 12:18 Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network David Wibergh
@ 2020-10-09 12:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2020-10-09 13:44   ` David Wibergh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2020-10-09 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Wibergh; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list

Hi David,

I haven't seen other reports like this before, so I'm not really sure off hand.

Firstly, do the Macbook and the Thinkpad respond to pings in the first
place? Modern macOS and Windows have built-in firewalls that usually
prevent this. So make sure that the pings work without WireGuard part
of the equation. If you've done this, and it works without WireGuard,
and it doesn't work with WireGuard, then we can proceed assuming this
is an issue with WireGuard.

That config seems fine on a cursory glance. You mentioned that this
only happens on certain phones. Which Android phones work as intended,
and which do not? Which operating system versions are each of these
running? The more general information about this that you can provide,
the more we can narrow it down.

Between Android releases, there have been subtle changes in their
routing particulars, and between Android vendors, I've seen aggressive
power management policies affecting WireGuard, and between Android
configurations, I've seen newer features like DoH/DoT confusing the
VPN subsystem too. And there may be other weird patterns and quirks
too. If this really is a problem with "phone X but not phone Y," we'll
need some more smells to find out what's going on.

Alternatively, you can dump `ip route show table all` and `ip rule
show` and `iptables-save` on each of the phones and see if you notice
an obvious difference in the routing that netd sets up. That might not
lead to a fix of the issue, but it might add more precision to why
it's not working as intended.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network
  2020-10-09 12:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2020-10-09 13:44   ` David Wibergh
  2020-10-09 14:02     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Wibergh @ 2020-10-09 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2637 bytes --]

Hi,

The Windows laptop that I'm usin as "destination ping" has the network profile set to private, so the S10e and Macbook are able to ping it.

The phones that we've tested so far that work as intended are:

- Pixel 2, Android 11
- Pixel 2XL, Android 11
- Meizu M5S, Android 6 (flyme 6.3.1)
- Oneplus 2, LineageOS 17.1
- Sony Xperia XZ1, Android 9

The phone I have access to and does not work properly:

- Samsung Galaxy S10e, Android 10. One UI 2.0 with android security patch level 1 February 2020.

WireGuard on iOS with excluding private IPs is able to ping the Windows laptop.

I'm attaching a photo of the Sony Xperia XZ1 & Samsung Galaxy S10e next to each other, displaying discoverable devices in the newly created wifi network to troubleshoot this further.

Command output has also been attached from Sony Xperia XZ1 & Samsung Galaxy S10e.

Thanks,
David


På 9 oktober 2020 kl. 14:22:01, Jason A. Donenfeld (jason@zx2c4.com) skrev:
> Hi David,
>  
> I haven't seen other reports like this before, so I'm not really sure off hand.
>  
> Firstly, do the Macbook and the Thinkpad respond to pings in the first
> place? Modern macOS and Windows have built-in firewalls that usually
> prevent this. So make sure that the pings work without WireGuard part
> of the equation. If you've done this, and it works without WireGuard,
> and it doesn't work with WireGuard, then we can proceed assuming this
> is an issue with WireGuard.
>  
> That config seems fine on a cursory glance. You mentioned that this
> only happens on certain phones. Which Android phones work as intended,
> and which do not? Which operating system versions are each of these
> running? The more general information about this that you can provide,
> the more we can narrow it down.
>  
> Between Android releases, there have been subtle changes in their
> routing particulars, and between Android vendors, I've seen aggressive
> power management policies affecting WireGuard, and between Android
> configurations, I've seen newer features like DoH/DoT confusing the
> VPN subsystem too. And there may be other weird patterns and quirks
> too. If this really is a problem with "phone X but not phone Y," we'll
> need some more smells to find out what's going on.
>  
> Alternatively, you can dump `ip route show table all` and `ip rule
> show` and `iptables-save` on each of the phones and see if you notice
> an obvious difference in the routing that netd sets up. That might not
> lead to a fix of the issue, but it might add more precision to why
> it's not working as intended.
>  
> Jason
>  

[-- Attachment #2: sony.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5545 bytes --]

$ ip route show all
10.220.0.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.6
$ ip route show table all
default via 10.220.0.1 dev wlan0 table 1026 proto static
10.220.0.0/24 dev wlan0 table 1026 proto static scope link
0.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
8.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
11.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
12.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
16.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
32.0.0.0/3 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
46.227.67.134 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
64.0.0.0/2 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
128.0.0.0/3 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
160.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
168.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
172.0.0.0/12 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
172.20.192.155 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
172.32.0.0/11 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
172.64.0.0/10 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
172.128.0.0/9 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
173.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
174.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
176.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.0.0.0/9 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.128.0.0/11 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.160.0.0/13 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.165.9.158 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.169.0.0/16 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.170.0.0/15 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.172.0.0/14 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.176.0.0/12 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
192.192.0.0/10 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
193.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
194.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
196.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
200.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
208.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static scope link
default dev dummy0 table 1003 proto static scope link
10.220.0.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.6
broadcast 10.220.0.0 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.6
local 10.220.0.6 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope host src 10.220.0.6
broadcast 10.220.0.255 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.6
broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.1 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 172.20.192.155 dev tun0 table local proto kernel scope host src 172.20.192.155
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 table 1026 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 table 1026 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:c5a7:bdd0 dev tun0 table 1028 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:c5a7:bdd0 dev tun0 table 1028 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
default dev tun0 table 1028 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev dummy0 table 1003 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
default dev dummy0 table 1003 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev rmnet_data0 table 1009 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 2000 pref medium
default via fe80::69a8:d914:8160:58e3 dev rmnet_data0 table 1009 proto ra metric 1024 expires 1329sec hoplimit 255 pref medium
local ::1 dev lo table local proto unspec metric 0 pref medium
local fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:c5a7:bdd0 dev lo table local proto unspec metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::2a3f:69ff:fec8:740 dev lo table local proto unspec metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::2c03:deff:fe32:d296 dev lo table local proto unspec metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::cda1:1c6:bb03:6c0c dev lo table local proto unspec metric 0 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev dummy0 table local metric 256 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev rmnet_data0 table local metric 256 mtu 2000 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev wlan0 table local metric 256 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev tun0 table local metric 256 pref medium
$ ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local
10000:  from all fwmark 0xc0000/0xd0000 lookup 99
10500:  from all iif lo oif dummy0 uidrange 0-0 lookup 1003
10500:  from all iif lo oif rmnet_data0 uidrange 0-0 lookup 1009
10500:  from all iif lo oif wlan0 uidrange 0-0 lookup 1026
11000:  from all iif tun0 lookup 97
12000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x20000 iif lo uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1028
12000:  from all fwmark 0xc00ce/0xcffff lookup 1028
13000:  from all fwmark 0x10063/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 97
13000:  from all fwmark 0xd0001/0xdffff iif lo lookup 1009
13000:  from all fwmark 0x100cd/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1026
13000:  from all fwmark 0x100ce/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1028
13000:  from all fwmark 0x100ce/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-0 lookup 1028
14000:  from all iif lo oif dummy0 lookup 1003
14000:  from all fwmark 0xc0000/0xc0000 iif lo oif rmnet_data0 lookup 1009
14000:  from all iif lo oif wlan0 lookup 1026
14000:  from all iif lo oif tun0 uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1028
15000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 99
16000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 98
17000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 97
19000:  from all fwmark 0xcd/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1026
21000:  from all fwmark 0xce/0x1ffff lookup 1026
22000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0xffff iif lo lookup 1026
32000:  from all unreachable

[-- Attachment #3: galaxy.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5084 bytes --]

$ ip route show table all
0.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
8.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
11.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
12.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
16.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
32.0.0.0/3 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
46.227.67.134 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
64.0.0.0/2 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
128.0.0.0/3 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
160.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
168.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
172.0.0.0/12 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
172.27.240.16 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
172.32.0.0/11 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
172.64.0.0/10 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
172.128.0.0/9 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
173.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
174.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
176.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.0.0.0/9 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.128.0.0/11 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.160.0.0/13 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.165.9.158 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.169.0.0/16 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.170.0.0/15 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.172.0.0/14 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.176.0.0/12 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
192.192.0.0/10 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
193.0.0.0/8 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
194.0.0.0/7 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
196.0.0.0/6 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
200.0.0.0/5 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
208.0.0.0/4 dev tun0 table 1061 proto static scope link
90.132.128.59 via 10.220.0.1 dev wlan0 table 99 proto static
default via 10.220.0.1 dev wlan0 table 1017 proto static
10.220.0.0/24 dev wlan0 table 1017 proto static scope link
10.220.0.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.5
broadcast 10.220.0.0 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.5
local 10.220.0.5 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope host src 10.220.0.5
broadcast 10.220.0.255 dev wlan0 table local proto kernel scope link src 10.220.0.5
broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.1 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 172.27.240.16 dev tun0 table local proto kernel scope host src 172.27.240.16
fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:e827:475a dev tun0 table 1061 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:e827:475a dev tun0 table 1061 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev tun0 table 1061 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
default dev tun0 table 1061 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 table 1017 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 table 1017 proto static metric 1024 pref medium
local ::1 dev lo table local proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
local fd00:0:1337:cafe:1111:1111:e827:475a dev tun0 table local proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::2cd1:3bff:fece:5c6d dev wlan0 table local proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
local fe80::95fb:ac18:144f:f287 dev tun0 table local proto kernel metric 0 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev tun0 table local metric 256 pref medium
ff00::/8 dev wlan0 table local metric 256 pref medium
$ ip rule show
0:      from all lookup local
10000:  from all fwmark 0xc0000/0xd0000 lookup 99
10500:  from all iif lo oif wlan0 uidrange 0-0 lookup 1017
11000:  from all iif tun0 lookup 97
12000:  from all fwmark 0xc0289/0xcffff lookup 1047
12000:  from all fwmark 0xc02a3/0xcffff lookup 1058
12000:  from all fwmark 0xc02a4/0xcffff lookup 1059
12000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x20000 iif lo uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1061
12000:  from all fwmark 0xc02ab/0xcffff lookup 1061
13000:  from all fwmark 0x10063/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 97
13000:  from all fwmark 0x10289/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-0 lookup 1047
13000:  from all fwmark 0x102a3/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-0 lookup 1058
13000:  from all fwmark 0x102a4/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-0 lookup 1059
13000:  from all fwmark 0x102ab/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1061
13000:  from all fwmark 0x102ab/0x1ffff iif lo uidrange 0-0 lookup 1061
13000:  from all fwmark 0x102ad/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1017
14000:  from all iif lo oif tun0 uidrange 0-99999 lookup 1061
14000:  from all iif lo oif wlan0 lookup 1017
15000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 99
16000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 98
17000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0x10000 lookup 97
19000:  from all fwmark 0x2ad/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1017
21000:  from all fwmark 0x2ab/0xffff lookup 1017
22000:  from all fwmark 0x0/0xffff iif lo lookup 1017
32000:  from all unreachable

[-- Attachment #4: Screenshot at Oct 09 15-40-55.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 1659779 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network
  2020-10-09 13:44   ` David Wibergh
@ 2020-10-09 14:02     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  2020-10-09 14:52       ` David Wibergh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2020-10-09 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Wibergh; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list

Hmm, from that command output, I'm still not quite sure. The most
significant difference I can see from casual inspection is:

Sony:
19000:  from all fwmark 0xcd/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1026
21000:  from all fwmark 0xce/0x1ffff lookup 1026

Galaxy:
19000:  from all fwmark 0x2ad/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1017
21000:  from all fwmark 0x2ab/0xffff lookup 1017

Is the galaxy missing a leading 0x1 in the mask of that second rule there?

What do you get on each when you run `ip route get 10.220.0.4`? Same
thing or is it different?

I also noticed that on the Galaxy, there's a direct route to some
telco server -- `90.132.128.59 via 10.220.0.1 dev wlan0 table 99 proto
static`. I didn't see this direct route on the Sony. I doubt it's
related to the above, but I've also never seen this before and wonder
if it's some VoLTE/VoWIFI hand-over trick in recent Android networking
stacks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network
  2020-10-09 14:02     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
@ 2020-10-09 14:52       ` David Wibergh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Wibergh @ 2020-10-09 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason A. Donenfeld; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list

The command output is the same:


Sony

$ ip route get 10.220.0.4
10.220.0.4 dev wlan0 table 1026 src 10.220.0.6 uid 10356
    cache


Galaxy S10e

$ ip route get 10.220.0.4
10.220.0.4 dev wlan0 table 1017 src 10.220.0.5 uid 10294
    cache


We’ll try to get some of our users to run similar tests. We do have an S7 that we can dig up and do some testing on. If you want to go down the rabbit hole, but don’t have access to a galaxy device, I could ship the S10e to you.

Thanks,
David


På 9 oktober 2020 kl. 16:03:02, Jason A. Donenfeld (jason@zx2c4.com) skrev:
> Hmm, from that command output, I'm still not quite sure. The most
> significant difference I can see from casual inspection is:
>  
> Sony:
> 19000: from all fwmark 0xcd/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1026
> 21000: from all fwmark 0xce/0x1ffff lookup 1026
>  
> Galaxy:
> 19000: from all fwmark 0x2ad/0x1ffff iif lo lookup 1017
> 21000: from all fwmark 0x2ab/0xffff lookup 1017
>  
> Is the galaxy missing a leading 0x1 in the mask of that second rule there?
>  
> What do you get on each when you run `ip route get 10.220.0.4`? Same
> thing or is it different?
>  
> I also noticed that on the Galaxy, there's a direct route to some
> telco server -- `90.132.128.59 via 10.220.0.1 dev wlan0 table 99 proto
> static`. I didn't see this direct route on the Sony. I doubt it's
> related to the above, but I've also never seen this before and wonder
> if it's some VoLTE/VoWIFI hand-over trick in recent Android networking
> stacks.
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-14 10:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-09 12:18 Samsung Galaxy S10e can’t reach local devices in network David Wibergh
2020-10-09 12:21 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-10-09 13:44   ` David Wibergh
2020-10-09 14:02     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-10-09 14:52       ` David Wibergh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).