From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b3b8e970 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 87543f26 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id bb964f31 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id ffd52e75 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b187so156441280oif.0 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:30:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 23:30:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nat traversal / userspace impl To: "Jason E. Aten" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Jason E. Aten wrote: > The "number of security problems" with the approach mentioned in passing in > the 2016-August message would need enumeration and addressing. Is anybody > thinking about those? Is this on the roadmap for future plans? If you're referring to the proof of concept example code for hole punching... it's just PoC/example code. If you'd like to develop it into something production worthy, you're more than welcome. It's licensed under the GPLv2. Jason