From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 43ad2a33 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c9a7991a for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0d9ec15d for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 325269e9 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i12-v6so63944278oik.2 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:27:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <580E3DE0-4D06-46C5-A972-96C1F687A7B7@abelbeck.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:27:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: receive: use gro call instead of plain call To: Lonnie Abelbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hey Lonnie, Wow, thanks for benching that (and watching the git repo for the experiment-of-the-day). This performance increase certainly exceeds my expectations; I'm quite pleased it's working so well. You might, by the way, be interested in using Flent for testing. It's slightly more scientific, and its developer hangs out on this mailing list. https://flent.org/ Jason