From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7ca8b11f for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id a99dc6b9 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id cc3d4456 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id be707c55 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k145so1156191oih.3 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:13:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multiple wireguard interface and kworker ressources To: nicolas prochazka Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Will keep a kworker at 100% CPU, even after that command completes? > I'm unable to reproduce this here. Could you give me detailed > environmental information so that I can reproduce this precisely? > Something minimal and easily reproducable would be preferred. Okay, I have a working reproducer now, and I've isolated the issue to the xt_hashlimit garbage collector, an issue outside the WireGuard code base. I might look for a work around within WireGuard, however. I'll keep you posted.