From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id f629d1b7 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 79e00dd5 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 19887ffd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id t196so109721870lff.3 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 02:26:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7365258.20161107095446@vodka.home.kg> References: <25241985.20161106100258@vodka.home.kg> <1289478110.20161106110707@vodka.home.kg> <7365258.20161107095446@vodka.home.kg> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:26:43 +0100 Message-ID: To: k@vodka.home.kg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] mips32 crash List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hey k, Excellent work! My MIPS VM is still alive. :) On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:54 AM, wrote: > After 10 hours of testing it crashed but another way. > I did mistake. It did not shutdown arm<>mips connection. It was almost > idle but still on. Do you mean to indicate that this crash is the result of the same issue as before? Or of a different one? > <4>[56173.377275] Unhandled kernel unaligned access[#1]: > <4>[56173.377970] [<80241948>] add_interrupt_randomness+0xa8/0x208 Either memory corruption resulted in add_interrupt_randomness getting a bad pointer from irq_randomness, which was unaligned, or there's more sinister misgivings in Linux itself... Let's just assume the former, rather than the latter. Jason