Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Kerr <david@kerr.net>
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: Source IP incorrect on multi homed systems
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 11:32:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJJxGdGSYR_mofRVpZDQsifjZJXXSNNsPqUV-RfWDMO0N2P2dQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d7bc930-65d9-f13e-cedc-e0451407be85@chil.at>

Without getting into the debate of whether wireguard is acting
correctly or not, I think there is a possible workaround.

1. In the iptables mangle table PREROUTING, match the incoming
interface and destination address and --set-xmark a firewall MARK
unique to this interface/destination
2. Create a new ip route table that sets the default route to go out
on the interface with the source address you want (same as destination
address in iptables)
3. Create a new ip rule that sends all packets with firewall mark set
in iptables to the routing table you just created

Repeat above for each interface/address you need to mangle, with a
unique firewall mark and routing table for each.

It may be necessary to use CONNMARK in PREROUTING and OUTPUT to
--restore_mark.  I can't remember if this is needed or not, its been a
while since I configured iptables with this.

This should ensure that any packet that comes into an
interface/address is replied to from the same interface/address.

David


On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 9:44 AM Christoph Loesch <wireguard-mail@chil.at> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't think no one wants to fix it, there are several users having this issue. I rather guess no one could find a suitable solution to fix it.
>
> @Nico: did you try to delete the affected route and add it again with the correct source IP ?
>
> as I mentioned it in https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2021-November/007324.html
>
> ip route del <NET>
> ip route add <NET> dev <ALIAS_DEV> src <SRC_IP>
>
> This way I was able to (at least temporary) fix this issue on multi homed systems.
>
> Kind regards,
> Christoph
>
> Am 19.02.2023 um 13:13 schrieb Nico Schottelius:
> > Hey Sebastian,
> >
> > Sebastian Hyrwall <sh@keff.org> writes:
> >
> >> It is kinda. It's been mentioned multiple times over the years but no one seems to want to fix it. Atleast you should be able to specify bind/src ip in the
> >> config. I gave up WG because of it. Wasn't accepted by my projects security policy since src ip could not be configured.
> >>
> >> There is an unofficial patch however,
> >>
> >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/5fa98082093344c86345f9f63305cae9d5f9f281
> > the binding is somewhat related to this issue and I was looking for that
> > feature some time ago, too. While it is correlated and I would really
> > appreciate binding support, I am not sure whether the linked patch does
> > actually fix the problem I am seeing in multi homed devices.
> >
> > As long as wireguard does not reply with the same IP address it was
> > contacted with, packets will get dropped on stateful firewalls, because
> > the returning packet does not match the state session database.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Nico
> >
> > --
> > Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-19 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-18 20:14 Nico Schottelius
     [not found] ` <CAHx9msc1cNV80YU7HRmQ9gsjSEiVZ=pb31aYqfP62hy8DeuGZA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-02-18 22:34   ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19  0:45 ` Mike O'Connor
2023-02-19  8:01   ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19  9:19     ` Mikma
2023-02-19 12:04       ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 12:10     ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 18:59       ` Peter Linder
     [not found]     ` <2ed829aaed9fec59ac2a9b32c4ce0a9005b8d8b850be81c81a226791855fe4eb@mu.id>
2023-02-19 12:13       ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 14:39         ` Christoph Loesch
2023-02-19 16:32           ` David Kerr [this message]
2023-02-19 16:54             ` Sebastian Hyrvall
2023-02-19 18:04               ` Janne Johansson
2023-02-19 18:08                 ` Sebastian Hyrvall
2023-02-19 20:11                 ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 17:05             ` tlhackque
2023-02-19 18:37               ` David Kerr
2023-02-19 18:52                 ` tlhackque
2023-02-19 18:42               ` tlhackque
2023-02-19 20:18                 ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 20:42                   ` Roman Mamedov
2023-02-19 21:19                     ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-19 22:06                       ` tlhackque
2023-02-19 22:42                       ` Src addr code review (Was: Source IP incorrect on multi homed systems) Daniel Gröber
2023-02-20  0:28                         ` 曹煜
2023-02-20 10:40                           ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-20 11:21                             ` 曹煜
2023-02-20  9:47                         ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-20 20:43                           ` dxld
2023-02-19 21:39                     ` Source IP incorrect on multi homed systems tlhackque
     [not found]               ` <CADGd2DoE6TCtCxxWL7JWyNW5+yy_Pe+9MNzHznbudMWLTXQreA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-02-19 18:30                 ` Fwd: " John Lauro
2023-02-19 22:28                 ` tlhackque
2023-02-20  0:58                   ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2023-02-19 20:02           ` Nico Schottelius
2023-02-20 11:09 Janne Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJJxGdGSYR_mofRVpZDQsifjZJXXSNNsPqUV-RfWDMO0N2P2dQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david@kerr.net \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).