From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: volkswak@gmail.com
Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3ed3f12e
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>;
 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7e519d64
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>;
 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v21so1142682wmc.1
 for <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJrqK=1cvf0HRx2zLH=wYr=13Y4N=mK4qjHRWgtmX4W7rkGKrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJrqK=1cvf0HRx2zLH=wYr=13Y4N=mK4qjHRWgtmX4W7rkGKrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: al so <volkswak@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:40:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrqK=0X1gerGN=OVCNp-eNqw1S9N9OLQDMQCV4GQVN0dXHw-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: wireguard for site-to-site VPN use case
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146959439eeac0567f30a9b"
List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard <wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/options/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/>
List-Post: <mailto:wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
List-Help: <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard>,
 <mailto:wireguard-request@lists.zx2c4.com?subject=subscribe>

--001a1146959439eeac0567f30a9b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

>
> How does Wireguard compare to Tinc and ZeroTier in terms of ease of use
> and security.
>
> I looked at Tinc. Seems pretty easy to setup being Decentralized Mesh
> architecture. Security doesn't seem good. No exploits reported may be due
> to no large commercial deployments.
>
> ZeroTier seems pretty secure. And Generic. Not sure how well it fits
> Site-to-Site VPN case.
>
>
> Going back to my original question:
> How does Wireguard compare to Tinc and ZeroTier in terms of ease of use
> and security.
>
> -volk
>

--001a1146959439eeac0567f30a9b
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>How does Wireguard compare=
 to Tinc and ZeroTier in terms of ease of use and security.<br></div><div><=
br></div><div>I looked at Tinc. Seems pretty easy to setup being Decentrali=
zed Mesh architecture. Security doesn&#39;t seem good. No exploits reported=
 may be due to no large commercial deployments.</div><div><br></div><div>Ze=
roTier seems pretty secure. And Generic. Not sure how well it fits Site-to-=
Site VPN case.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Going back to my ori=
ginal question:</div><div>

<div style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:sm=
all;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:norma=
l;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;te=
xt-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration-style=
:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">How does Wireguard compare to Tinc =
and ZeroTier in terms of ease of use and security.<br></div>

<br></div><div>-volk</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--001a1146959439eeac0567f30a9b--