From: Markus Woschank <markus.woschank@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@gmail.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Roaming Mischief
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKUy5awqDFNFmhiL+sDdO7YiwnkJAdjuNbeP9+d=V8ABqgrZog@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKUy5ax9kWWF_PPLQYy09-EVnH-CCfQDpYctn3X+Cpe+FNP_0Q@mail.gmail.com>
> where you need to make sure that while one peer is down the other doesn't move.
This is obviously wrong, should be:
"where you need to make sure that only one side changes it's network
while one is down."
On 17 November 2017 at 23:06, Markus Woschank <markus.woschank@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My example is most useful when both endpoints are roaming and either
>> endpoint needs to be able to initiate sessions. It's not a very
>> common scenario I'll give you that, but the current full roaming
>> support does enable it seamlessly (when you also enable keep-alives).
>
> Thank you for clarifying.
>
> This really sound like an unusual situation, where you need to make
> sure that while one peer is down the other doesn't move.
> I wonder if this could not, should the need arise, be solved in another fashion.
>
> From experience I have another concern towards the current mechanism.
> When configuring two peers pointing at each other and by mistake
> setting one endpoint IP to a wrong value (typo in the IP) there is a
> good chance this mistake may not be noticed for quiet some time, if
> the correctly configured endpoint initiates the connection most of the
> time. The user (me), believing to have correctly configured the link,
> may be taken by surprise at a later point in time when the link is not
> established, as he expects, when the wrongly configured side tries to
> initiate it after say a reboot. This is more of a concern to me than
> supporting to roaming peers.
>
> Also the thought of something like `wg showconf wg0 >
> /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf` happening at shutdown frightens me a little.
> Because if the command fails for whatever reason the configuration
> will be truncated and after the reboot completes the link will be
> non-functional (conf vs state).
>
> Please don't interpret my comments the wrong way, I grew to love
> wireguard. Just trying to state the kinks (IMO) I see, and this is one
> of them.
> I still vote for: if an endpoint is specified, don't allow the peer
> from another source - no config syntax change needed ;).
>
> Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-17 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 9:59 Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-14 10:30 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2017-11-14 13:53 ` Lonnie Abelbeck
2017-11-14 14:08 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2017-11-14 13:25 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-11-14 13:50 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2017-11-15 18:38 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-15 22:03 ` Aaron Jones
2017-11-17 17:23 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-17 17:36 ` Aaron Jones
2017-11-17 18:38 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-17 18:46 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-17 21:29 ` Aaron Jones
2017-11-17 22:06 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-17 22:11 ` Markus Woschank [this message]
2017-11-18 9:38 ` Matthias Urlichs
2017-11-18 15:01 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-18 15:11 ` Markus Woschank
2017-11-16 17:45 ` Stephen Major
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKUy5awqDFNFmhiL+sDdO7YiwnkJAdjuNbeP9+d=V8ABqgrZog@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=markus.woschank@gmail.com \
--cc=aaronmdjones@gmail.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).