From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: martinmoen@gmail.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 6b66644d for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com (mail-it0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8b1561eb for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id m47so26509188iti.0 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 05:07:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Martin Eskdale Moen Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:07:18 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Git tags To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Oliver Beattie Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0311ea10811b055212a1e6" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --94eb2c0311ea10811b055212a1e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Jason I usually find it useful when I'm provisioning with ansible to be able to point to a tag and upgrade when I'm ready, so when I provision new nodes they all have the same version, even if a new version is out. On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 at 03:44 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Oliver Beattie wrote: > > Given tags in Git are extremely lightweight, would it be unreasonable > > to keep them around? > > I can keep them around, no problem. I just thought they looked sort of > cluttered, so I removed them, but if it's useful to you, I don't mind > keeping them. > > What use case did you have in mind, anyway, for old tags? > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard > --94eb2c0311ea10811b055212a1e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jason
I usually find it useful=C2=A0when I'm pr= ovisioning with ansible to be able to point to a tag and upgrade when I'= ;m ready, so when I provision new nodes they all have the same version, eve= n if a new version is out.

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 at 03:44 Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
=
Hi Oliver,

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Oliver Beattie <oliver@monzo.com> wrote:
> Given tags in Git are extremely lightweight, would it be unreasonable<= br> > to keep them around?

I can keep them around, no problem. I just thought they looked sort of
cluttered, so I removed them, but if it's useful to you, I don't mi= nd
keeping them.

What use case did you have in mind, anyway, for old tags?

Jason
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@li= sts.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard=
--94eb2c0311ea10811b055212a1e6--