From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296FAC433EF for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E42C610C7 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:54:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1E42C610C7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=scjalliance.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id a995688d; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 66bfdf4a (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id y1so6974130plk.10 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:53:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scjalliance.com; s=g5; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AXIMpoAqjOuqrPnB4Il2xUDHnLx6emlb0UZNCfESNzc=; b=GCUkXyk/74fbpB7lfS7sy1IcvFx6FBjP9LGGJgO//hmjOVVVMv+8Mxd9TENqzieDE0 BIAwaJXU+RRWJ2B9+++l0v4WVWKfRDKxEa1MJpNZNOkZzRI2d5ycZoMUzh15yM9YVyeK 9moflgGpM4UzqZOdcFZzq2OjnfNQAKtRR4sJc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AXIMpoAqjOuqrPnB4Il2xUDHnLx6emlb0UZNCfESNzc=; b=h0Yqto8dY1aEOsh7n9C4G2OP5/0oC3/FxcY5xSxkmcH9QgfAzGuJuPXVmNmAjck6QE Ts8Y/prZF6/o9WEtsqfO+P5xhzePNRrwSc1Kmr5axMfQEyqePsRM7nJzuPKgVRF/JMrD mko1CaHX4jbsCP52PF0zcD6f/45Iu/FTdGFtib3hGuVmVBnRljYq/Wk4OAHqbNyJf+VJ GXVPfau1YgqI5TI8bAQruIjnOaWR5zZ1lM6AcWI1pHCZCDIJLPMM6deQr1WJ8cSlF1kE 5BfI0EvoBECVUUf50OH8TndB8XHb47YEwCOxam7PFjBoxzAnMle3Bj51O3cYw84mG+hK V2UQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335BJz/b40CpJFjQkjwg1mG9FwoLsie6/UIBW/x04XXGBBxdsMZ ExTnu3Pvw74eNEAujXrI9aMeZgantUwVb9Jm+F8sukGIk4g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmoxnKiRxpfzYm5a+s+fFtOB2vOBIWXsDsHTGySHUVw7wDC13E2+j0MLnhbQC4+VLv9BG/d7QU5qCvkz54i/g= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1207:b0:138:e2f9:6c98 with SMTP id l7-20020a170903120700b00138e2f96c98mr10488069plh.11.1632505998161; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:53:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joshua Sjoding Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:53:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Windows stuck in boot after WireGuard update (switch to WireGuardNT?) To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Oliver Freyermuth , Arlo Clauser , John-Paul Andreini , WireGuard mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Awesome! Can do. Thanks Jason! Joshua Sjoding SCJ Alliance IT Specialist On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:49 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I think we might be onto something with https://w-g.pw/l/ZO5Z ... > > I'm going to cut a new release in the next few hours here. When that's > released, would you try updating to 0.4.10, going back to using the > kernel implementation, and letting me know whether the problem > resurfaces? In the absence of being able to locally produce this on a > debuggable machine, I think this kind of trial and error is all we've > got. Hopefully the theory behind https://w-g.pw/l/ZO5Z is correct. > > Jason