Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
To: Jason@zx2c4.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jiri@resnulli.us,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: wireguard/napi stuck in napi_disable
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:33:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALrw=nEoT2emQ0OAYCjM1d_6Xe_kNLSZ6dhjb5FxrLFYh4kozA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALrw=nGoSW=M-SApcvkP4cfYwWRj=z7WonKi6fEksWjMZTs81A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:23 PM Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We run calico on our Kubernetes cluster, which uses Wireguard to
> encrypt in-cluster traffic [1]. Recently we tried to improve the
> throughput of the cluster and eliminate some packet drops we’re seeing
> by switching on threaded NAPI [2] on these managed Wireguard
> interfaces. However, our Kubernetes hosts started to lock up once in a
> while.
>
> Analyzing one stuck host with drgn we were able to confirm that the
> code is just waiting in this loop [3] for the NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit to
> be cleared for the Wireguard peer napi instance, but that never
> happens for some reason. For context the full state of the stuck napi
> instance is 0b100110111. What makes things worse - this happens when
> calico removes a Wireguard peer, which happens while holding the
> global rtnl_mutex, so all the other tasks requiring that mutex get
> stuck as well.
>
> Full stacktrace of the “looping” task:
>
> #0  context_switch (linux/kernel/sched/core.c:5380:2)
> #1  __schedule (linux/kernel/sched/core.c:6698:8)
> #2  schedule (linux/kernel/sched/core.c:6772:3)
> #3  schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock (linux/kernel/time/hrtimer.c:2311:3)
> #4  usleep_range_state (linux/kernel/time/timer.c:2363:8)
> #5  usleep_range (linux/include/linux/delay.h:68:2)
> #6  napi_disable (linux/net/core/dev.c:6477:4)
> #7  peer_remove_after_dead (linux/drivers/net/wireguard/peer.c:120:2)
> #8  set_peer (linux/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c:425:3)
> #9  wg_set_device (linux/drivers/net/wireguard/netlink.c:592:10)
> #10 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (linux/net/netlink/genetlink.c:971:8)
> #11 genl_family_rcv_msg (linux/net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051:10)
> #12 genl_rcv_msg (linux/net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066:8)
> #13 netlink_rcv_skb (linux/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545:9)
> #14 genl_rcv (linux/net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075:2)
> #15 netlink_unicast_kernel (linux/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342:3)
> #16 netlink_unicast (linux/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368:10)
> #17 netlink_sendmsg (linux/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910:8)
> #18 sock_sendmsg_nosec (linux/net/socket.c:730:12)
> #19 __sock_sendmsg (linux/net/socket.c:745:16)
> #20 ____sys_sendmsg (linux/net/socket.c:2560:8)
> #21 ___sys_sendmsg (linux/net/socket.c:2614:8)
> #22 __sys_sendmsg (linux/net/socket.c:2643:8)
> #23 do_syscall_x64 (linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:51:14)
> #24 do_syscall_64 (linux/arch/x86/entry/common.c:81:7)
> #25 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x9c/0x184 (linux/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
>
> We have also noticed that a similar issue is observed, when we switch
> Wireguard threaded NAPI back to off: removing a Wireguard peer task
> may still spend a considerable amount of time in the above loop (and
> hold rtnl_mutex), however the host eventually recovers from this
> state.
>
> So the questions are:
> 1. Any ideas why NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit never gets cleared for the
> threaded NAPI case in Wireguard?
> 2. Is it generally a good idea for Wireguard to loop for an
> indeterminate amount of time, while holding the rtnl_mutex? Or can it
> be refactored?

I've been also trying to reproduce this issue with a script [1]. While
I could not reproduce the complete lockup I've been able to confirm
that peer_remove_after_dead() may take multiple seconds to execute -
all while holding the rtnl_mutex. Below is bcc-tools funclatency
output from a freshly compiled mainline (6.11):

# /usr/share/bcc/tools/funclatency peer_remove_after_dead
Tracing 1 functions for "peer_remove_after_dead"... Hit Ctrl-C to end.
^C
               nsecs                         : count     distribution
                   0 -> 1                    : 0        |                    |
                   2 -> 3                    : 0        |                    |
                   4 -> 7                    : 0        |                    |
                   8 -> 15                   : 0        |                    |
                  16 -> 31                   : 0        |                    |
                  32 -> 63                   : 0        |                    |
                  64 -> 127                  : 0        |                    |
                 128 -> 255                  : 0        |                    |
                 256 -> 511                  : 0        |                    |
                 512 -> 1023                 : 0        |                    |
                1024 -> 2047                 : 0        |                    |
                2048 -> 4095                 : 0        |                    |
                4096 -> 8191                 : 0        |                    |
                8192 -> 16383                : 0        |                    |
               16384 -> 32767                : 0        |                    |
               32768 -> 65535                : 0        |                    |
               65536 -> 131071               : 0        |                    |
              131072 -> 262143               : 0        |                    |
              262144 -> 524287               : 68       |**                  |
              524288 -> 1048575              : 658      |********************|
             1048576 -> 2097151              : 267      |********            |
             2097152 -> 4194303              : 68       |**                  |
             4194304 -> 8388607              : 124      |***                 |
             8388608 -> 16777215             : 182      |*****               |
            16777216 -> 33554431             : 72       |**                  |
            33554432 -> 67108863             : 34       |*                   |
            67108864 -> 134217727            : 22       |                    |
           134217728 -> 268435455            : 11       |                    |
           268435456 -> 536870911            : 2        |                    |
           536870912 -> 1073741823           : 2        |                    |
          1073741824 -> 2147483647           : 1        |                    |
          2147483648 -> 4294967295           : 0        |                    |
          4294967296 -> 8589934591           : 1        |                    |

avg = 14251705 nsecs, total: 21548578415 nsecs, count: 1512

Detaching...

So we have cases where it takes 2 or even 8 seconds to remove a single
peer, which is definitely not great considering we're holding a global
lock.

> We have observed the problem on Linux 6.6.47 and 6.6.48. We did try to
> downgrade the kernel a couple of patch revisions, but it did not help
> and our logs indicate that at least the non-threaded prolonged holding
> of the rtnl_mutex is happening for a while now.
>
> [1]: https://docs.tigera.io/calico/latest/network-policy/encrypt-cluster-pod-traffic
> [2]: https://docs.kernel.org/networking/napi.html#threaded
> [3]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/net/core/dev.c?h=v6.6.48#n6476

Ignat

[1]: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ignatk/4505d96e02815de3aa5649c4aa7c3fca/raw/177e4eab9f491024db6488cd0ea1cbba2d5579b4/wg.sh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-23 18:23 Ignat Korchagin
2024-09-23 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-23 21:33 ` Ignat Korchagin [this message]
2024-09-25 15:06   ` Daniel Dao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALrw=nEoT2emQ0OAYCjM1d_6Xe_kNLSZ6dhjb5FxrLFYh4kozA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ignat@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).