From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4DC3A59E for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72E5B21670 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=natulte-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@natulte-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="zDX+vesi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 72E5B21670 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=natulte.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5a19b070; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 78cc17e1 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com (mail-lj1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id dc40dc2c for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id m24so14099606ljg.8 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=natulte-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GqqFW4BxtHztPdC3hSXYk05mYKSVILrxMnJUO4Xuq+8=; b=zDX+vesiLgJpY6uwNPD6HJu5NYjSiJJzs0PFa2y/cQ6VrqPWpo4jVP4L1pQYE6FxL9 xiBTCRPCBoUhdcH39QqcAk8cCwJh6mH4jgoL4NNHRZNBgrFWNO0FznblAl10mz7YM8n8 nSCyDbB8vZUxCNZV+zZtwpCQ0A9AEf5fpjj6roD/7ozkq3lJOo1kvtzylaUjIwlVzBMg SKLhIjTpBMmjDGSiXu3ldc+iS6Q22Xf0ibPK7rI01eADMkXe0EEyl6ceme9wqJ7Zn1EL RHx0C0VhePAlJ5/rpI9u8fIK+YjOzR7j8/wx7vS5bc6wY4tX7olRrdG03oqX1bQXRgHQ Z3+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GqqFW4BxtHztPdC3hSXYk05mYKSVILrxMnJUO4Xuq+8=; b=iz0GyEj9PygR8obV7R5VgguwxM6VYOuBHRzsHEo5Uj2D/yk7XVuXN9OvJeS5vILusm FlM8evkvpyprQmjp+XRhnYdrYKyxd5LLOZcJtDN2PWbCOazGeffh9G5QGJV42gP3fPRs zc2GRXNcKAZMFdE9mmL49z1hmZFHVtWUSQcRgzeITRiwUj6kUIyTMHXLdc1uTTYSIMws /0kSUOo682DuPGxG0P0XFR+Xr73ED6u1CN6wCjP6XK5aF/RhTw4EZ+JtJu5hiiFERwEE si2pRwk+euCgLWxta/3i8TBJcDdYFggLye9Zkg0xYQe8YXyUZWkeR3h9vjrA4/+XICMV TDvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzznRWk7LVJv7beRaBfGsuWbCzoLfBamWTU55S8ha3Jrov6PDq cCxFbyLYvwXeQlHJHYsG7S5m+u/fb8Ih712pEKVxGg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzx+fqsR198Y8tdfdvxi4quUqsZIH1ltNjZwFJJ1aObseQynkb8nT4AFMpbTKoisOOsAtNhZvs9r8vcOYUmlVw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:292:: with SMTP id b18mr1392216ljo.131.1567464364878; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 15:46:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190902224125.GH1480@debian> In-Reply-To: <20190902224125.GH1480@debian> From: David Anderson Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:46:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FYI: systemd's networkd (v242) incorrectly setting listen-port on wg interface To: Georg Faerber Cc: WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:42 PM Georg Faerber wrote: > > Hi, > > On 19-09-02 12:42:00, David Anderson wrote: > > Seems to be known to Debian: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936198 . I'm not > > super familiar with Debian's development process, but I _think_, from > > that bug + the systemd debian repo's state, that the fix is now > > submitted and pending upload to unstable, after which it should flow > > backwards over time into Buster. > > That's only partially correct, and maybe the following is nitpicking, > but at least wanted to ensure this is known: > > The fix is pending upload to unstable, and will hit testing soon after. > Expect this for the upcoming days. However, as buster is stable, it will > not "automatically" flow into buster. This needs proposing an targeted > update to the Stable Release Managers and an ACK by them -- which would > probably be granted due to the severity. If you want this to happen, > it's probably a good idea to tell the maintainer, so he knows people > would be happy if this gets fixed in buster as well. Thanks for the correction! I tried to figure out how stuff gets into stable, but my quick research didn't reveal an obvious standard method. So the way to go about this is to ping the maintainer of the systemd package out of band? Or file a bug on Debian's bugtracker? I'm still not sure how to kick off this process. Cheers, - Dave > > Cheers, > Georg > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard