From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: dave@natulte.net Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8f6d414b for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f174.google.com (mail-ua0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 41220cde for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 21:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 35so48379410uak.1 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:36:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: David Anderson Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:36:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (Unofficial) wireguard packages for Debian Stretch (testing) To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f89f4e8bf1c05484802bc Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --f403045f89f4e8bf1c05484802bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Dave, > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Anderson wrote: > > Note that right now, only amd64 packages are available. If you think > there's > > demand for Debian on 32-bit x86, I can set up i386 builders as well. > > I doubt anybody cares about i386, but likely armv{6,7} and arm64 are > in demand somewhat, at the very least due to Rasberrian users. > Hmm, I don't have functional arm-ish things on hand, but I'll see what I can do with emulated setups. I'll skip i386 for now, if it turns out to be in demand it's one VM spinup away. > Jason > --f403045f89f4e8bf1c05484802bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
Hey Dave,

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Anderson <dave@natulte.net> wrote:
> Note that right now, only amd64 packages are available. If you think t= here's
> demand for Debian on 32-bit x86, I can set up i386 builders as well.
I doubt anybody cares about i386, but likely armv{6,7} and arm64 are=
in demand somewhat, at the very least due to Rasberrian users.

Hmm, I don't have functional arm-ish things on = hand, but I'll see what I can do with emulated setups. I'll skip i3= 86 for now, if it turns out to be in demand it's one VM spinup away.


Jason

--f403045f89f4e8bf1c05484802bc--