From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: dave@natulte.net Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id f267c82d for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com (mail-ua0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b7929175 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 96so49737629uaq.3 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:41:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: David Anderson Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:40:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: (Unofficial) wireguard packages for Debian Stretch (testing) To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed1a21e392a05484c4377 Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --001a113ed1a21e392a05484c4377 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm failing at setting up arm builds, raspbian/rpi emulation is not in a great shape these days. In the meantime, debian stable for amd64 is up. Updated instructions for both debian versions are at https://packagecloud.io/danderson/wireguard#readme-scrollto . In particular, the jessie install requires first installing a backported kernel. I'll keep poking at arm builds for a bit, but I don't promise anything. - Dave On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:36 PM, David Anderson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld > wrote: > >> Hey Dave, >> >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Anderson >> wrote: >> > Note that right now, only amd64 packages are available. If you think >> there's >> > demand for Debian on 32-bit x86, I can set up i386 builders as well. >> >> I doubt anybody cares about i386, but likely armv{6,7} and arm64 are >> in demand somewhat, at the very least due to Rasberrian users. >> > > Hmm, I don't have functional arm-ish things on hand, but I'll see what I > can do with emulated setups. I'll skip i386 for now, if it turns out to be > in demand it's one VM spinup away. > > >> Jason >> > > --001a113ed1a21e392a05484c4377 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm failing at setting up arm builds, raspbian/rpi emu= lation is not in a great shape these days. In the meantime, debian stable f= or amd64 is up. Updated instructions for both debian versions are at=C2=A0<= a href=3D"https://packagecloud.io/danderson/wireguard#readme-scrollto">http= s://packagecloud.io/danderson/wireguard#readme-scrollto . In particular= , the jessie install requires first installing a backported kernel. I'l= l keep poking at arm builds for a bit, but I don't promise anything.
- Dave

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:36 PM, David Anderson <dave@nat= ulte.net> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
Hey Dave,

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Anderson <dave@natulte.net> wrote:
> Note that right now, only amd64 packages are available. If you think t= here's
> demand for Debian on 32-bit x86, I can set up i386 builders as well.
I doubt anybody cares about i386, but likely armv{6,7} and arm64 are=
in demand somewhat, at the very least due to Rasberrian users.

Hmm, I don't have functional arm-ish thi= ngs on hand, but I'll see what I can do with emulated setups. I'll = skip i386 for now, if it turns out to be in demand it's one VM spinup a= way.


Jason


--001a113ed1a21e392a05484c4377--