From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: stromberg@mullvad.net Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 131196bc for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com (mail-wr0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d4ce9cf9 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u97so4158503wrc.1 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 04:05:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171107093832.GB7891@kroah.com> References: <20171107093832.GB7891@kroah.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fredrik_Str=C3=B6mberg?= Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 13:05:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Production usage of Wireguard To: "wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Greg KH wrote= : > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:41:18PM +0000, Ferris Ellis wrote: >> Hello Wireguard mailing list! >> >> I have been very interested in the WireGuard project for a little while = now >> and am in the process of evaluating it. While benchmarks and code review= s >> are useful, they don=E2=80=99t uncover many of the issues that can poten= tially wake >> one up at 3am. I=E2=80=99d hunted around on the web for a while but wasn= =E2=80=99t able to >> find any articles on running WireGuard in a production environment. I kn= ow >> the project is still young but was wondering if anyone on the mailing li= st >> had started using WireGuard in production? And, if so, if they=E2=80=99d= be willing >> to share some details about their use case and experience? > > There are at least two companies offering Wireguard as a VPN service > "commercially" right now, so it is being used in that manner already. > Hi everyone, We (Mullvad) use it in production on a bunch of our servers. Here's a blog post I wrote about it that might be of interest to you Ferris: https://mullvad.net/blog/2017/9/27/wireguard-future/ > But as "production environment" always means different things for > different people, perhaps only you can answer this question? What would > it take for _you_ to be comfortable with it in your network environment? I second Greg's question. What are your criteria? Cheers, Fredrik Str=C3=B6mberg