On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Jason E. Aten <j.e.aten@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. If it uses UDP only, how does NAT traversal (firewall punch through)
> work?
Should I conclude that addressing NAT-ed clients is not something that WireGuard itself plans to address?
The "number of security problems" with the approach mentioned in passing in the 2016-August message would need enumeration and addressing. Is anybody thinking about those? Is this on the roadmap for future plans?