Development discussion of WireGuard
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferris Ellis <ferris@ferrisellis.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with list volume
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:01:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EE5CC249-FD46-4984-8A0A-0CC583E3C3FA@ferrisellis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9p+20_OGuGDTF5e7nfGz=-PTBrVfOxu3P27GQMd3vLrLA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1260 bytes --]

>> Maybe it is easier for
>> you to have an wiki and bugtracker like gitlab or gitlab, where
>> everybody can get the informations he need, show bugs, get infos about
>> bugs and ask questions to other users.
> 
> That's what the list is supposed to be for, though. Maybe it's just a
> matter of SNR?


Just my two cents on matter based on personal experience:

Issue trackers: I personally suspect as adoption increases the popular expectation will be for a more ticket oriented (i.e. Github like) experience for filing bugs and feature requests. For better or worse people seem to feel there’s a large commitment increase on their part from filing a ticket  and being part of a community mailing list.

Wikis: As for wikis, I always have had mixed feelings about them. For large projects like Gentoo or Arch they’re great, in my opinion, for community knowledge accumulation. But for smaller projects I’ve found having something to the effect of a community maintained `docs/` directory with markdown is just simpler and easier. Plus you can always go back and generate some pretty webpages out of the `docs/` markdown files if you’ve reached the adoption level where people expect documentation to be in webpages.

Cheers,
Ferris


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2042 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30 13:03 Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-11-30 13:59 ` Mytril
2017-11-30 14:03   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-12-01 23:01     ` Ferris Ellis [this message]
2017-12-03 14:03       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-12-07 16:34 ` Joe Doss
2017-12-08  2:33   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-12-08  9:02     ` David Woodhouse
2017-12-08 16:44     ` Joe Doss
2017-12-08 17:56       ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2017-12-08 18:09         ` Joe Doss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EE5CC249-FD46-4984-8A0A-0CC583E3C3FA@ferrisellis.com \
    --to=ferris@ferrisellis.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).