From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2FAC433EF for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3687D6115A for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:23:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3687D6115A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0f78a5ee; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id ddbc9861 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id b189-20020a1c1bc6000000b0030da052dd4fso2838562wmb.3 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:18:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=HD++/zPXcnUmn2kRtnPtFpAfRsxiNm8lqSjbkuFbU4Y=; b=MMQZu1KtwMKVSADPmGhPffCNINDgpxK2nQFV51XxlQsoT+O8TqtJFUYglXSatGnEnG iW4LSJDkoVDrz1ug7mCqnstkBE0KVDt+pTj/04bgp3QiVHHr+q/QbvdopvQAps8fgqAD eUgcL2zF0JnW9JUGyKxOJziLr4OlLWEzfd9mwghVoWZPabP6VJEpQYf2RaYJpqglc9AZ wE2n9WBNFC/ksxI/NcaE0Wg5EpUDB3IQ77ZMxMc2p0d0HKtvZPdHvWfdRC00OehH5rtQ BH8ziX8cR7ezsNdYtRjKuZg5Lrf+CXL3nsPoEzM7gtNdRmTS1+LoynluSaMrQCn9dZTT Thew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=HD++/zPXcnUmn2kRtnPtFpAfRsxiNm8lqSjbkuFbU4Y=; b=irhMjLBpvfbuuYmYWd/2OBIF2eME2R1T4LacdZdZbJtjS4UHxWA5mZaob7jDMnVm5a EANyW1kaQO/Y3VdgJnfSF3xSaFm9LHhxoN8mgIG29297Nb3J/sV+TFitrDHGYzvXH3yU eRSYRCMUPn6xLDrLho5JJgT7uRgmrl40YyeduzSF3oPzObFBadPsc99Erdv1AKUmyESR q5IYGJlRarV2QXtWutII7++6/C4Y/ubgodPkFp/a2myfrEtIXg2gtd3wqWTxRWPVcJ6C WwHpdGR+ws+KUjd/pM+a7CJ6z5q3Bb4cpbtjuhtIJ6gAd38LhtOgRRCKgbN887V+gYY3 olYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UiE1BoynRPwiWdY/3IJXtgjoNbgUKg/unhab2TarUv0i7v/Xt ZOCOY0YIH4DUZydsf0U7wE8ptPAlojQllw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjvBNq7L+aSY4r4nLGAbVhbJQMho3FZx4Ijb72iApspigLImJkVEPC1Enu6lvoly+N4YIN0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce8d:: with SMTP id q13mr5571619wmj.103.1634645923748; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (82-132-228-119.dab.02.net. [82.132.228.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w5sm14887221wra.87.2021.10.19.05.18.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: CW Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Build wireguard-linux-compat on SLES15 (s390x) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:18:40 +0100 Message-Id: References: Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com In-Reply-To: To: faustin@fala.red X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19A348) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:21:06 +0000 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, If I didn=E2=80=99t remember wrong, wg should be included in kernel with 15s= p3. Sent from my iPhone > On 19 Oct 2021, at 12:05, Faustin Lammler wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi! >=20 > FYI, > I have managed to build wireguard by removing the #define. > https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux-compat/tree/src/compat/compat.h#n859= >=20 > I am not a C dev, so I am not sure what the implications are but I > understand that it's a kind of debugging structure and it's also not > defined on CENTOS8 so, I guess it should be OK. >=20 > Cheers! >=20 > -- > Faustin