Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpumask: fix comment of cpumask_xxx

[Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:06:51AM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
> After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask
> optimizations"), the cpumask size is divided into three different case,
> so fix comment of cpumask_xxx correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 8fbe76607965..248bdb1c50dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu)
>   * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask
>   * @srcp: the cpumask pointer
>   *
> - * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set.
> + * Returns >= small_cpumask_bits if no cpus set.

There's no such thing like small_cpumask_bits. Here and everywhere,
nr_cpu_ids must be used.

Actually, before 596ff4a09b89 nr_cpumask_bits was deprecated, and it
must be like that for all users even now.

nr_cpumask_bits must be considered as internal cpumask parameter and
never referenced outside of cpumask code.

Thansk,
Yury