From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E801EB64DD for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id ac863df9; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tootai.net (mail1.tootai.net [213.239.227.108]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPS id 92b905a6 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tootai.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.tootai.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00A56081887 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:33:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tootai.net; s=mail; t=1690878784; bh=leyqnxOnG0iqd8h+cZCia9gOvRqzsqKugPrl8C3pUbM=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=axWSbW+hnM6AbrT1nUenpzJ1rYbEDzDaV2cjTBPBuI/RW2m9NCOo6nOSZ9XquMjzi P54N5Xou1HmTso7NJQVUpc3ZOGlLpuOWT+N3TDjslXSTG8Xc3NXhMSUmpo4obKEyr0 m13eDpOO0EeNx7Mk1oMjPdTmAEHn2k/dPZkLrZ8U= Received: from [IPV6:fd99:1234:beef:cafe::24] (unknown [IPv6:fd99:1234:beef:cafe::24]) by mail1.tootai.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 65C856081883 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:33:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tootai.net; s=mail; t=1690878784; bh=leyqnxOnG0iqd8h+cZCia9gOvRqzsqKugPrl8C3pUbM=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=axWSbW+hnM6AbrT1nUenpzJ1rYbEDzDaV2cjTBPBuI/RW2m9NCOo6nOSZ9XquMjzi P54N5Xou1HmTso7NJQVUpc3ZOGlLpuOWT+N3TDjslXSTG8Xc3NXhMSUmpo4obKEyr0 m13eDpOO0EeNx7Mk1oMjPdTmAEHn2k/dPZkLrZ8U= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 10:33:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.1 From: Daniel Subject: Re: Endpoint failover ip To: wireguard References: <20230731222744.5wej7mv5sef57w46@House.clients.dxld.at> Content-Language: fr-FR In-Reply-To: <20230731222744.5wej7mv5sef57w46@House.clients.dxld.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi Daniel Le 01/08/2023 à 00:27, Daniel Gröber a écrit : > Hi Daniel, > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:39:35PM +0200, Daniel wrote: >> I create a hostname with few IPs v4 & v6 for my wireguard server. I faced >> today a problem that after a failure with the ip a customer wg was >> registered, it continue to try to register with this ip insteed to fallback >> to another one. > [...] > [1]: Supporting multiple active endpoints is where we have to head to fix > this properly IMO, see my recent proposal > https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2023-July/008111.html Yes, that's exactly the problem. Will see with babeld but hope that something native can be done in wireguard. Thanks for your feedback -- Daniel