From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: jens@viisauksena.de Received: from viisauksena.de (v32412.1blu.de [178.254.39.111]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4fcc80e2 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:33:55 +0000 (UTC) To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" References: <7a999008-9396-c82d-1764-d658873af7fc@viisauksena.de> <8eebb32d-b302-5975-726b-874a9ad12a84@viisauksena.de> <20160803064853.Horde.ZExiUp0by8SskYUmZW7CFq4@www.vdorst.com> <20160803201014.Horde.RctXDT7A7Fi6hFbWMcqDmJs@www.vdorst.com> <923cdc92-aa01-758a-5741-99a3f6009dc5@viisauksena.de> From: jens Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:34:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1507EC69EC1AC65E51639CB3" Cc: WireGuard mailing list Subject: Re: [WireGuard] LEDE / OpenWrt test - on TP-Link841Nv11 - 15MBs and crash List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------1507EC69EC1AC65E51639CB3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04.08.2016 10:15, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Your prior communications have not been clear to me, and recently > somebody took the mailing list off the CC. In order to steer this > conversation back on a useful track, please check all that apply: > > [ X ] I have tried removing "sk_clear_memalloc(sock);" and > "sk_set_memalloc(sock->sk);" from socket.c, and the problem still > continued. > [ ] I have tried removing "sock->sk->sk_sndbuf =3D INT_MAX;" from > socket.c, and the problem still continued. > [ X ] I do not know how or am unable to make changes to the source > code, recompile, and test these changes. > [ X ] I have an extra device that I can mail to Jason so that he can > debug the issue. * for the extra device we may pay new ones , since you easily get them for 15 euro per part (the TP link 841N) * buildchain for crosscompiling is ready now, but unfortunately we test it in our local hack space when there is free time, (n3ph and me) could be in the next days .. by the way : the setup from Rene is different: see this same thread - message from 11h today from Rene. (mainly he run iperf on one routerdevice direct, and only connect to wg outside, where we build a uniqe wireguard bridge between two similar routerdevices and no iperf had to be done (and regulated) on this devices ... just storms of packets) --=20 make the world nicer, please use PGP encryption --------------1507EC69EC1AC65E51639CB3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 04.08.2016 10:15, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Your prior communications have not been clear to me, and recently somebody took the mailing list off the CC. In order to steer this conversation back on a useful track, please check all that apply:

[ X  ] I have tried removing "sk_clear_memalloc(sock);" and "sk_set_memalloc(sock->sk);" from socket.c, and the problem still continued.
[  ] I have tried removing "sock->sk->sk_sndbuf = INT_MAX;" from socket.c, and the problem still continued.
[ X ] I do not know how or am unable to make changes to the source code, recompile, and test these changes.
[ X ] I have an extra device that I can mail to Jason so that he can debug the issue.
* for the extra device we may pay new ones , since you easily get them for 15 euro per part (the TP link 841N)
* buildchain for crosscompiling is ready now, but unfortunately we test it in our local hack space when there is free time, (n3ph and me) could be in the next days ..

by the way : the setup from Rene is different: see this same thread - message from 11h today from Rene.
(mainly he run iperf on one routerdevice direct, and only connect to wg outside, where we build a uniqe wireguard bridge between two similar routerdevices and no iperf had to be done (and regulated) on this devices ... just storms of packets) 

-- 
make the world nicer, please use PGP encryption
--------------1507EC69EC1AC65E51639CB3--